In "The Bet," the lawyer and the banker strike their "senseless" bet at a dinner party which was hosted by the banker fifteen years prior to the start of the story. The banker and his guests were discussing the death penalty and whether it is more humane to kill a man or sentence him to life imprisonment. The banker and lawyer have contrasting opinions on this topic: the banker thinks it is more humane to kill a man, while the lawyer says it is better to "live anyhow than not at all."
At this point, the banker, being a "spoilt and frivolous" man, offers the lawyer two million rubles to stay in solitary confinement for five years. The lawyer, tempted by such a high amount of money, immediately accepts the bet and extends the term of solitary confinement from five to fifteen years. Evidently, both men are keen to prove themselves right and to profit from the wager. The banker sees this as an opportunity to enhance his reputation, while the lawyer stands to profit from the bet financially. This is how the "senseless" bet comes to be.
Saturday, August 2, 2014
How did the banker and the lawyer strike the bet in "The Bet" by Anton Chekhov?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why is the fact that the Americans are helping the Russians important?
In the late author Tom Clancy’s first novel, The Hunt for Red October, the assistance rendered to the Russians by the United States is impor...
-
Lionel Wallace is the subject of most of "The Door in the Wall" by H.G. Wells. The narrator, Redmond, tells about Wallace's li...
-
Resourceful: Phileas Fogg doesn't let unexpected obstacles deter him. For example, when the railroad tracks all of a sudden end in India...
-
Friar Lawrence plays a significant role in Romeo and Juliet's fate and is responsible not only for secretly marrying the two lovers but ...
-
In the late author Tom Clancy’s first novel, The Hunt for Red October, the assistance rendered to the Russians by the United States is impor...
-
Back in Belmont, the place of love contrasted with the sordid business arena of Venice, Lorenzo and Jessica make three mythological referenc...
-
The poem contrasts the nighttime, imaginative world of a child with his daytime, prosaic world. In the first stanza, the child, on going to ...
-
I would like to start by making it clear that this story is told from the third person omniscient point of view. At no point is the story to...
No comments:
Post a Comment