There is no conversation. Roald Dahl deliberately avoids any dialoguing between Patrick and Mary Maloney. Instead, Patrick does all the talking and Mary merely listens. She is so astonished by what she is hearing that she is speechless. Dahl's reason for handling this critical part of the story in the way he does is a matter of speculation. It seems likely that the author did not want Mary to participate in any conversation about the subject because that would have made Patrick's decision less settled, less definite, less final. She is--at least at this point in the story--the kind of woman who would have begged and pleaded if she had had an opportunity to do so. She probably wouldn't have contradicted her husband, but she would have been likely to say such things as, "I'm sorry. I can change. I will. I promise. Please give me a chance. What about our baby?"
Instead of presenting a two-way conversation, the author illustrates what Patrick is saying by showing how Mary might be annoying him and suffocating him with her mothering. To Patrick, Mary might come across as too devoted, too loving, too dependent, too attentive. Here are a few examples:
"I'll get it!" she cried, jumping up.
"Darling, shall I get your slippers?"
"Darling," she said. "Would you like me to get you some cheese?"
"Anyway," she went on, "I'll get you some cheese and crackers first.""But you must eat! I'll fix it anyway, and then you can have it or not, as you like."
The author must have wanted to make it clear as quickly as possible that Patrick's decision was final. His apparent coldness and brutality make Mary's extreme reaction more plausible. He doesn't give her a chance to protest or ask for clarification. When she clobbers him over the head with the frozen leg of lamb, the reader can understand and sympathize with her abrupt change of character. At the same time, the fact that she has always been so loving and devoted help her to avoid suspicion. Both Patrick and Mary are well known to the investigating officers, and they believe the Maloneys had an ideal marriage.
Thursday, February 16, 2017
In Roald Dahl's "Lamb to the Slaughter," why don't we get any details of the conversation between Patrick and Mary Maloney in which he tells her about his decision to end things?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why is the fact that the Americans are helping the Russians important?
In the late author Tom Clancy’s first novel, The Hunt for Red October, the assistance rendered to the Russians by the United States is impor...
-
There are a plethora of rules that Jonas and the other citizens must follow. Again, page numbers will vary given the edition of the book tha...
-
The poem contrasts the nighttime, imaginative world of a child with his daytime, prosaic world. In the first stanza, the child, on going to ...
-
The given two points of the exponential function are (2,24) and (3,144). To determine the exponential function y=ab^x plug-in the given x an...
-
The only example of simile in "The Lottery"—and a particularly weak one at that—is when Mrs. Hutchinson taps Mrs. Delacroix on the...
-
Hello! This expression is already a sum of two numbers, sin(32) and sin(54). Probably you want or express it as a product, or as an expressi...
-
Macbeth is reflecting on the Weird Sisters' prophecy and its astonishing accuracy. The witches were totally correct in predicting that M...
-
The play Duchess of Malfi is named after the character and real life historical tragic figure of Duchess of Malfi who was the regent of the ...
No comments:
Post a Comment