I think the phrase, which occurs right at the beginning of the book, has less to do with time or the past and more to do with being truthful to one’s values and the connections that bind people together. Obviously, the prime example of the past returning is the narrator’s guilt over the fate of Hassan. But Amir is marked by other experiences that endure as well. One example is the conversation Amir overhears as a boy between his father and his friend Rahim Khan, in which his father claims that there is “something missing” in Amir—he never stands up for himself. These words come to define Amir as much as his relationship with Hassan does: although his childhood is defined by his relationship with Hassan, he never considers Hassan a “friend" because the ethnic and religious differences are too great. “In the end, I was a Pashtun and he was a Hazara, I was Sunni and he was Shi'a, and nothing was ever going to change that. Nothing.” (Amir says this in Chapter 4.) There is a sense that Amir’s relationship with Hassan is predetermined by history—that the past will always outweigh whatever personal connection they might have.
In some ways, the book works to undercut the inevitability of history. For one thing, the book shows that the past, or what we think we know of the past, might be fiction. Hassan is not Ali’s son, as Amir has been told his entire life, but actually his father’s. This raises the possibility that other things Amir has been told about himself—like his lack of “backbone,” for instance—might also be false. Nevertheless, these beliefs shape Amir’s life. His decision to return to Afghanistan to claim Hassan’s orphaned son Sohrab is an example of this. In doing so, Amir repudiates his father’s failure to recognize Hassan as his own and his own failure to see Hassan as a friend and equal. At the same time, he is ”standing up” for his values and showing the determination his father always thought he lacked. In this sense, even though he realizes that his father was unfair in his characterization of him, Amir’s actions are still determined by his father’s criticism, although they are transformed by his compassion for Hassan and his love for Sohrab.
Monday, September 16, 2019
Give examples of what is meant by "it is impossible to bury the past because the past always claws its way out."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why is the fact that the Americans are helping the Russians important?
In the late author Tom Clancy’s first novel, The Hunt for Red October, the assistance rendered to the Russians by the United States is impor...
-
There are a plethora of rules that Jonas and the other citizens must follow. Again, page numbers will vary given the edition of the book tha...
-
The poem contrasts the nighttime, imaginative world of a child with his daytime, prosaic world. In the first stanza, the child, on going to ...
-
The given two points of the exponential function are (2,24) and (3,144). To determine the exponential function y=ab^x plug-in the given x an...
-
The play Duchess of Malfi is named after the character and real life historical tragic figure of Duchess of Malfi who was the regent of the ...
-
The only example of simile in "The Lottery"—and a particularly weak one at that—is when Mrs. Hutchinson taps Mrs. Delacroix on the...
-
Hello! This expression is already a sum of two numbers, sin(32) and sin(54). Probably you want or express it as a product, or as an expressi...
-
Macbeth is reflecting on the Weird Sisters' prophecy and its astonishing accuracy. The witches were totally correct in predicting that M...
No comments:
Post a Comment