Intriguing question. Each of these three "worlds" can be argued to have replaced a part of the Roman Empire. In the end none of them replaced it completely.
The Byzantine or Eastern Roman Empire never "replaced" the greater Roman Empire, but it continued aspects of its heritage for some time to come. Its height was during the reign of Justinian I, not long after the fall of Rome (ca. mid-6th c. BCE). Thereafter the Byzantine Empire remained solvent but was constantly defending itself from Islamic incursions from the later middle ages on, and it finally fell to the Ottomans in the mid-15th c. While one could say it was the best candidate to be a Roman successor, this is complicated by some things. For one, Orthodox Christianity was quite different from Catholicism.
The Islamic Empire expanded rapidly after the death of Muhammad. The initial Caliphates took control of the Arabian Peninsula, Asia Minor, and North Africa in rapid succession. The Umayyad Caliphate was the largest (this was the period when Muslims captured Spain from the Visigoths), but the Abbasid Caliphate was the most stable Islamic Empire, existing from the mid-8th to the mid-13th century. Again, while these Islamic empires were impressive in their extent, none of them captured Europe. And none of them, obviously, were Christian.
The Franks, while they ruled the smallest of the three Empires mentioned here, have perhaps the strongest claim to replacing the Roman legacy. The most elaborate expression of Frankish rule was the Carolingian Empire, first established by Charlemagne, who was actually crowned the "Holy Roman Emperor" by the Pope in 800 CE. While the Carolingian Empire didn't exist on the scale of the Byzantine or Islamic Empires, it continued Roman traditions most extensively. Charlemagne built churches in the Romanesque style, converted pagans to the Christian faith at the point of a sword, and emphasized the value of education. If, however, one considers which culture best preserved the legacy of Greek and Roman thought and amended that thought as well, then title goes to the Islamic Empire. Before it fell in the mid-13th c., Baghdad was a major cultural center—not rivaling Rome, but nonetheless significant.
Thursday, May 30, 2019
Byzantine, Islamic, and Frankish worlds had replaced what was the Roman Empire. Which state most deserves the title of Rome’s successor and why?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why is the fact that the Americans are helping the Russians important?
In the late author Tom Clancy’s first novel, The Hunt for Red October, the assistance rendered to the Russians by the United States is impor...
-
There are a plethora of rules that Jonas and the other citizens must follow. Again, page numbers will vary given the edition of the book tha...
-
The poem contrasts the nighttime, imaginative world of a child with his daytime, prosaic world. In the first stanza, the child, on going to ...
-
The given two points of the exponential function are (2,24) and (3,144). To determine the exponential function y=ab^x plug-in the given x an...
-
The play Duchess of Malfi is named after the character and real life historical tragic figure of Duchess of Malfi who was the regent of the ...
-
The only example of simile in "The Lottery"—and a particularly weak one at that—is when Mrs. Hutchinson taps Mrs. Delacroix on the...
-
Hello! This expression is already a sum of two numbers, sin(32) and sin(54). Probably you want or express it as a product, or as an expressi...
-
Macbeth is reflecting on the Weird Sisters' prophecy and its astonishing accuracy. The witches were totally correct in predicting that M...
No comments:
Post a Comment