In our common, everyday speech, ethics and morals are used more or less interchangeably. Both are concerned with what's right and wrong, how we conduct ourselves toward others, and so on. However, some scholars have argued that there is a slight but significant difference between the two, one that relates to their respective sources. On this account, ethics generally refers to rules of moral conduct that are external to the individual agent. Examples would include business ethics, where those engaged in business practices are expected to adhere to certain standards imposed upon them.
This example is particularly instructive in highlighting the distinction between ethics and morals because it shows that there is often a clash between them. What is considered sound from an ethical business perspective may not be regarded as moral. For instance, lawyers will defend their criminal clients in court even though they know full well that they're guilty. In terms of business ethics, this is perfectly acceptable; morally speaking, not so much.
Morals, then, tend to be individualized, internalized, and then acted out by the moral agent as part of her daily life. They tend to derive in the most part from family, society and various religious traditions, but the individual still chooses to live by such moral codes. In that sense, they can be said to express the moral agent's autonomy. Morals can of course change over time and differ widely from place to place. Yet they tend to have a much greater degree of consistency; but then, they have to if they're going to provide us with the appropriate guidance in making choices in our lives.
Ethics tend to be much more flexible. But then, they have to be, too. External standards such as legal and medical ethics need to move with the times, taking into account developments in, respectively, law and medicine. Medical ethics of the 19th century would most certainly not be appropriate today. Yet the myriad moral quandaries served up by the practice of medicine remain more or less unchanged.
Wednesday, April 5, 2017
What is the difference in ethics and morals
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why is the fact that the Americans are helping the Russians important?
In the late author Tom Clancy’s first novel, The Hunt for Red October, the assistance rendered to the Russians by the United States is impor...
-
Lionel Wallace is the subject of most of "The Door in the Wall" by H.G. Wells. The narrator, Redmond, tells about Wallace's li...
-
In the late author Tom Clancy’s first novel, The Hunt for Red October, the assistance rendered to the Russians by the United States is impor...
-
There are a plethora of rules that Jonas and the other citizens must follow. Again, page numbers will vary given the edition of the book tha...
-
Robinson Crusoe, written by Daniel Defoe, is a novel. A novel is a genre defined as a long imaginative work of literature written in prose. ...
-
The poem contrasts the nighttime, imaginative world of a child with his daytime, prosaic world. In the first stanza, the child, on going to ...
-
Friar Lawrence plays a significant role in Romeo and Juliet's fate and is responsible not only for secretly marrying the two lovers but ...
-
Resourceful: Phileas Fogg doesn't let unexpected obstacles deter him. For example, when the railroad tracks all of a sudden end in India...
No comments:
Post a Comment