Saturday, December 15, 2018

How did John Locke influence the constitution?

English philosopher John Locke’s contributions to the principles of social contract theory greatly influenced the Constitution of the United States. Social contract theory, the concept that national and state rights must be protected over certain individual rights, is the foundation of the Constitution and Western government. Locke prioritized the common good over personal interest because he believed it was the only way to ensure that each person was afforded an equal opportunity to life, liberty, and happiness. Individuals could advocate for their interests through the democratic process, but ultimately society was ruled by the majority.
Locke openly rejected England’s monarchy and proposed a democratic, federalist government system where responsibility and authority were divided among one federal and multiple state governments. In his book Second Treatise of Government, he wrote of his belief in “a state . . . of equality wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no having more than another.” This system of checks and balances was incorporated into the Constitution to protect individuals from abusive government power.
Locke died in 1704, but the books he penned were inspirational to the Founding Fathers. His revolutionary ideals of equality, democracy and political power became the framework of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States.
http://guierlaw.com/john-lockes-influence-on-the-united-states-constitution/


There’s a lot more to John Locke’s influence on the US Constitution than his book, Two Treatises on Government, or his theories about a Social Compact. His empiricist worldview, the notion that people are born without innate ideas, was a natural justification for the writers of the Constitution. It meant, basically, that it was all right, that it was permissible to try a new form of government. This was powerful ammunition against the British argument that no other form of government was suitable for the American colonies. So, it’s a reasonable assumption that John Locke’s empiricism was one of the things that made the Constitution possible.
Locke’s belief that Nature, by itself, didn’t endow anything with innate value is another important influence on the Constitution. That’s an outgrowth of his empiricism, and to the Founding Fathers it meant that something different had to be tried, that only their efforts would bring about a new relationship between a government and its citizens. In general, Locke thought that anything of value was created by human action, and that’s important for his third big idea.
The notion that private property must exist for democracy to work is the most important of Locke’s idea’s which influenced the US Constitution. The preservation of individual property rights is the basis for the theories of federalism and subsidiarity developed and debated in The Federalist. Mostly this influences the Constitution by limiting what went into it. The checks and balances of the Separation of Powers were inspired by the desire to preserve individual rights in property. The Great Compromise about representation in Congress was inspired by the notion that individual rights in property were like states’ rights against the Federal government.
It’s true that John Locke’s books and doctrines had a great influence on the US Constitution, but his personal philosophy influenced the Founding Fathers in profound ways.


John Locke's revolutionary theory of the Social Compact, or Social Contract, served as the inspiration for a "government of the people, by the people, and for the people." In other words, Locke's theory that governments derive their legitimacy from the "will of the people," gave rise to the notion of self-governance, and thus modern representative democracy. The social compact theory that Locke put forth stated that a group of people could agree to hold themselves accountable not to a monarch, but instead to a group of principals and laws that they would obey. Once this set of laws or principles (the social contract) was established, based on the values of those who drafted that contract, everyone in the community would have to obey the contract's provisions, or face the consequences.
The notion of having an actual constitution (in document form) came from Montesquieu, who took the social compact theory a step further. Montesquieu argued that it was not enough to have a group of founding principles, but that for a representative government to be seen as legitimate, it needed to enshrine those founding principles in one document, which everybody could back refer to when conflicts arose about how to govern. However, the entire inspiration for a government whose legitimacy comes from the people, and which is based on the laws of men, came directly from Locke. 
Moreover, the United States Constitution and our Declaration of Independence were influenced by John Locke's famous declaration that all men are endowed with certain "natural rights," which Locke described as, "life, liberty and property." Thomas Jefferson and his fellow Founding Fathers later translated Locke’s words into, "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. "Not only did these words end up in our Declaration of Independence, but they also served as the inspiration for our Bill of Rights, and the very notion that the government cannot and does have the power to take these rights away. As Locke argued, and as our founding fathers echoed, these rights are "inalienable.” Therefore, as Locke, and later, the Founding Fathers argued, our government can only protect and guarantee these inalienable rights, and the government exists primarily to do just that.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Why is the fact that the Americans are helping the Russians important?

In the late author Tom Clancy’s first novel, The Hunt for Red October, the assistance rendered to the Russians by the United States is impor...