Monday, July 9, 2018

Why does Camus includes in the story of the Czech family in The Stranger, and how does this relate to Meursault?

The primary character in The Stranger by Albert Camus is Meursault, who is the embodiment of author Camus’s views of existentialism: try though we might to imbue our lives with meaning, life essentially has none other than merely to exist. Thus, any attempt to associate actions or occurrences with meaning or to expect rationality is absurd. Meursault makes no attempt to find meaning in his life and the characters around him who try to see meaning in his actions fail to find any.
Camus includes a newspaper story about a family in Czechoslovakia to further convey this. The segment allows Camus show Meursault’s reaction to the newspaper story.
The very opening of The Stranger reveals that Meursault's general emotional state is characterized largely by indifference. His primary desires revolve around satisfying his fundamental bodily needs: to eat, to sleep, to relieve himself and to fulfill his sexual needs. For this reason, there is a lot of description in the book about these actions.
The book opens with:

MOTHER died today. Or, maybe, yesterday; I can’t be sure.” The telegram from the Home says: YOUR MOTHER PASSED AWAY. FUNERAL TOMORROW. DEEP SYMPATHY. Which leaves the matter doubtful; it could have been yesterday.

He cannot be sure! The very opening line is the ultimate in absurdity. It conveys his indifference to the person who gave him life and to the universe itself. It also conveys the absurdity of the telegram he receives. Camus does not say that Meursault did not love his mother, but rather that he does not even inquire about the exact date on which she died. Later, when he is examined by the magistrate, he expresses similar indifference to his situation and to G-d, just as he expresses a blasé attitude to the story of the Czech family.
In jail, Meursault passes the time by reading an old newspaper article about a man who left his village in Czechoslovakia and made his fortune abroad. He returns to surprise his mother and sister and they, not recognizing him, rob and kill him. When they realize what they have done, they commit suicide. Meursault is not very surprised and merely says that the Czech man should not have tried to surprise his family. “Anyhow, to my mind, the man was asking for trouble; one shouldn’t play fool tricks of that sort.” He does not attempt to find meaning in the story or the actions of any of the players involved.
“His mother and sister completely failed to recognize him,” in the article. Compare this to the opening of the book where Meursault does not know what day his own mother died. There is a parallel absurdity. When Meursault thinks that “In one way it sounded most unlikely,” it is closer to the reaction many people would have. The story is so horrible that it could not have happened! However, Meursault also feels that seen in “another [way], it was plausible enough.” It was or it was not plausible. His mother died that day or perhaps the day before. None of it matters.


When Meursault is jailed in the second half of Albert Camus’s novel The Stranger, he struggles with boredom. Meursault finds a yellowed newspaper article under his mattress and reads it “thousands of times” to kill time.
The article records the story of a Czech man who left his village at a young age, became rich and then attempted to surprise his mother and sister by returning incognito. Not recognizing their son and brother, the two women bludgeon him to death with a hammer when they discover he is wealthy. When they learn the truth of their robbery victims' identity, they commit suicide. As this is Meursault’s only reading material, he memorizes every detail and evaluates each nuance of the story for hours. His assessment of the story is brief:

In one way it sounded most unlikely; in another, it was plausible enough. Anyhow, to my mind, the man was asking for trouble; one shouldn’t play fool tricks of that sort.

Meursault is not concerned by the human aspect of the newspaper tragedy he memorized. Rather, he faults the son for playing “fool tricks” on his family and blames him for “asking for trouble.” It is likely that Meursault somehow identifies with the mother and daughter. He is, after all, imprisoned for murder and understands he is likely to be sentenced to death for his crime. Meursault’s unique interpretation of the newspaper article reveals the strangeness of his mental framework to the audience.
The story of the Czech man also connects to Meursault on a philosophical level. The Stranger is famous for its exploration of Camus’s philosophy of absurdism. Camus believed that human existence is absurd because humanity craves purpose in a meaningless universe. Only by embracing the absurdity of the human condition, Camus believed, can people forge their purpose and enjoy the life they have. The newspaper story about the murdered Czech man mirrors this philosophy almost as well as Meursault’s life does! The outcomes of each story are tragic but, ultimately, have no inherent morality or purpose.
I hope this helps.


During his first few days in prison, Meursault finds a scrap of newspaper in his cell. On it is written a story about a Czech man who left his homeland to find his fortune. Years later, now wealthy and successful, he returns home to give his family a big surprise. Unfortunately, before he can do so, he is robbed and murdered by his mother and sister, who don't realize his true identity. When they discover the terrible truth they both commit suicide.
Meursault reads the story many times. The overriding lesson he learns from it is that one shouldn't play tricks like the wealthy Czech; one shouldn't adopt a false identity. One must always be true to oneself, come what may. This is one of the main themes of existentialism as espoused by Camus. Each individual must choose their own identities and live by them in an absurd universe, godless and meaningless in equal measure. This attitude of complete authenticity calls for constant decision as to how we relate to the world.
Meursault, in his utter amorality, has nonetheless consistently chosen for himself how to live his life, irrespective of the deadly consequences that follow. The Czech man in the story, though, chose to put on a disguise, however well-meaning, in acting out a conventional little game. The end in both cases will be the same: death. But what matters for Meursault, as a true existentialist, is the choosing of a life project and one's total, unswerving commitment to it.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Why is the fact that the Americans are helping the Russians important?

In the late author Tom Clancy’s first novel, The Hunt for Red October, the assistance rendered to the Russians by the United States is impor...