Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Discuss how the Greeks and Trojans are portrayed in The Iliad vs. Inferno. Note that Dante and Virgil are sympathetic to the Trojans, whereas Homer championed Achilles, Ulysses (Odysseus), and the Greeks. What impact, if any, has Inferno had on how the Western world views or portrays characters like Ulysses or Virgil? The paper should have a clear topic (the terms) supported by the literature (provide ample citations from the literature). The paper should be 2.5 to 3 pages in length, with an introduction, three body paragraphs (a paragraph being roughly 13 to 18 sentences), and a conclusion.

Other pages, linked below, offer specific details on Greeks and Trojans in Dante's work. If we want to think more broadly, we can note that both Virgil and Homer end in the same place: Limbo. Virgil is a damned soul, however mild his punishment may be. In many cases, he is faulty in his knowledge, and Dante needs to grow beyond his master in order to enter Paradise.
One way he can grow is by abandoning his own partisanship (Guelph vs Ghibelline) and to reject simple partisanship from the Iliad. We can see Virgil being celebrated not so much for the Aeneid but for creating the poem of the Roman Empire, a form of government Dante admired. Dante, in turn, becomes a poet of the Christian Empire, while Homer is a poet of individual heroes. The Greeks who are most scorned in Dante's poem are those who sought fame or glory for themselves, or who—like Odysseus—used his intellectual talents to deceive others through false rhetoric.
As a poet, Virgil was long celebrated as a writer of eloquent Latin verse. He is still studied in Latin courses as a model of clean and graceful style. As mentioned, Virgil as Dante's character contains some lapses in knowledge, and a study of his relationship to Dante on this journey offers some insight to the type of growth as a poet Dante seeks to enshrine. Virgil is never repudiated entirely, but he is also not a very delightful character in Dante's poem. His self-sacrifice and duty to country are important in context, but less valued in later eras.
Dante's Ulysses, while punished in the canto of False Prophets, is a more inspiring voice. Even while displaying the rhetoric that lands him in Hell, Ulysses is compelling:

Consider well your seed.
You were not born to live as a mere brute does
But for the pursuit of knowledge and the good. (Pinsky translation)

This is the voice of the anti-hero, a figure that is developed in the Renaissance by Marlowe and Milton but also in the Romantic era. Tennyson's "Ulysses," for instance, offers a similarly ambivalent portrait of an aged king longing for exotic travel:

We are not now that strength which in old days Moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will, To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.

In both the Renaissance and the Romantic periods, the Greeks become more admired for their independence, daring, and aesthetic appeal. In the Neo-Classical period, Virgil's rationalism would have seemed more fitting.
Once we enter the Modern era, Odysseus again becomes the hero of Joyce's Ulysses. And, again, the figure of ambition, of creativity, and of adventure was more celebrated in art than the person of prudence and self-discipline. This divide—however appropriate with the Classical texts—is part of Dante's legacy.


Homer, being Greek, wrote the The Iliad from a viewpoint mainly favoring the Greeks. Yes, he created some admirable Trojans, such as King Priam and Prince Hector, but it was Greek culture to admire their enemies.  Dante, however, being Italian and more familiar with the Roman poet Virgil’s Aeneid, seems to be more pro-Trojan, reflecting the views of his Italian readers.  He does, however, present a variety of classical characters as immoral, since he peoples his version of Hell with both Trojans and Greeks (albeit heavier on the Greek count).
For example, Dante places both Helen and Paris in circle two, to be punished by battering winds for their lustful affair.  Yet Dante writes that his guide, Virgil, merely comments that the Trojan prince, Paris, is there, while he takes the time to comment on Greek-born Helen’s sin: “See Helen for whom / so many bad years revolved.” Technically, they were equally guilty in their shared lust, yet the Greek takes the brunt of Dante’s criticism.  The mighty Achilles is also punished in the circle of the lustful. Dante is somewhat mocking of this Greek, suggested in Virgil’s remark that Achilles’s “last battle was with love,” referring to the legend that Achilles abandoned the Greek army to marry a Trojan princess.
Another Greek, Ulysses, is punished in Canto 26, the eighth bolgia of the eighth circle, reserved for fraudulent evil counselors. Ulysses is trapped in torturous flames with his Greek cohort, Diomed, for their deceitful trickery against the Trojans, including the famed Trojan horse, which led to the destruction of Troy.  But the legends of Ulysses’s immoral behavior are not enough for Dante.  He creates an additional story of Ulysses convincing some of his men to take yet another journey after they finally are allowed to return to Ithaca.  In Dante’s story, Ulysses uses his gift of intelligent speaking to trick his men into sailing past the forbidden boundary set by the gods, where they are punished with death as their ship is pulled into the sea. It is interesting to note, however, that Ulysses is one of the few characters whom Dante gives a sense of remorse for his sinfulness, rather than the self-righteous attitude of the many other souls in Inferno.
Dante’s Inferno is a vivid, haunting reflection of our human fears concerning the afterlife.  As we read, are we not secretly glad that it is these “fictitious” characters suffering, and not ourselves?  Or rather, do we see ourselves in the characters?  We view Virgil as Dante described him, a virtuous, unbaptized poet “of much worth,” whose poetry so improved the world that he would be given special privileges in Hell. And while the Greeks might have admired the cunning Ulysses and the mighty warrior Achilles, Dante has forever pointed out their failings to the world, immortalized one last time in an epic poem, not celebrated for their greatness, but suffering eternally for their immorality.
https://digitaldante.columbia.edu/dante/divine-comedy/inferno/inferno-26/

What are six quotes in chapters 7–11 of To Kill a Mockingbird that show examples of marginalization?

To Kill a Mockingbird covers a wide spectrum of marginalization, including marginalization based on race, gender, social status, and association with other marginalized groups. Chapters 7–11 have examples of many different kinds of marginalization and reasons for that marginalization.
1. "Simply because we were licked a hundred years before we started is no reason for us not to try to win" (Chapter 9). This quote is from Atticus Finch and has to do with the fight against marginalization. He is pointing out that the system of marginalization is so ingrained in society that trying to fight that system is nearly impossible, but it is still important to fight for what is right.
2. "Why reasonable people go stark raving mad when anything involving a Negro comes up, is something I don't pretend to understand" (Chapter 9). This is another quote from Atticus Finch addressing the marginalization and prejudice against African Americans. This quote shows that racism and marginalization are so deeply ingrained in the system that even people who are reasonable in the rest of their lives have extreme reactions to issues that have to do with marginalized groups, in this case, African Americans.
3. "My folks said your daddy was a disgrace and that n****r oughta hang up from the water tank!" (Chapter 9). This quote is from Cecil Jacobs and is very telling about marginalization based on association. When Atticus agrees to defend Tom Robinson, both he and his family face backlash from the community because Atticus is daring to defend an African American against a white man. Even though Atticus and his family are not part of a marginalized group, their association with one is enough to marginalize them.
4. "You mean that little runt Grandma says stays with Miss Rachel every summer? . . . Grandma says he hasn't got a home . . . He just gets passed around from relative to relative, and Miss Rachel keeps him every summer" (Chapter 9). This quote is from Francis, Scout's cousin, in response to her declaring that she is going to marry Dill when they grow up. This is an example of marginalization based on social status; Dill is considered lesser because he doesn't have a permanent home or family unit. 
5. "What are you doing in those overalls? You should be in a dress and camisole, young lady! You'll grow up waiting on tables if someone doesn't change your ways!" (Chapter 11). This quote is from Mrs. Dubose, directed at Scout. Scout's tomboyish appearance is addressed multiple times in the novel, but this is one example of how she is judged and marginalized for her unladylike appearance. Mrs. Dubose essentially tells her that if she does not dress according to the standards of society for a lady, that she will grow up in a lesser social position (waiting tables).
6. " 'Scout,' said Atticus, 'n****r lover is just one of those terms that don't mean anything—like snot-nose. Its hard to explain—ignorant, trashy people use it when they think somebody's favoring negroes over and above themselves. It slipped into usage with some people like ourselves, when they want a common, ugly term to label somebody,"(Chapter 11). Atticus gives this speech to Scout following Scout telling Atticus what Cecil Jacobs said about him in the schoolyard. This goes further into marginalization by association and shows Scout that it doesn't matter what people say as long as they know that they are doing the right thing.

sum_(n=1)^oo 3^n/n^3 Determine the convergence or divergence of the series.

sum_(n=1)^oo 3^n/n^3
To determine if the series is convergent or divergent, apply the ratio test. The formula for the ratio test is:
L = lim_(n->oo) |a_(n+1)/a_n|
If L<1, the series converges.
If L>1, the series diverges.
And if L=1, the test is inconclusive.
Applying the formula above, the value of L will be:
L = lim_(n->oo) | (3^(n+1)/(n+1)^3)/(3^n/n^3)|
L= lim_(n->oo) | 3^(n+1)/(n+1)^3 * n^3/3^n|
L = lim_(n->oo) | (3n^3)/ (n+1)^3|
L= lim_(n->oo) | (3n^3)/(n^3+3n^2+3n+1)|
L=lim_(n->oo) |(3n^3)/(n^3(1+3/n+3/n^2+1/n^3))|
L= lim_(n->oo) |3/(1+3/n+3/n^2+1/n^3)|
L= 3/(1+0+0+0)
L=3
Therefore, the series diverges.

How does low self-esteem lead to Pecola's identity crisis?

Your question must be referring to Pecola Breedlove, the protagonist of The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison. Low self-esteem has taken a significant tall on Pecola's life to the point of utter desperation. Apparently, this young girl suffers the cruelty of her parents, classmates and other people in the community but blames everything on her "ugliness." Pecola Breedlove is obsessed with blue eyes, which according to her, is a sign of beauty. She delusively thinks that such eyes will change the way people perceive her. In fact, lack of self-confidence has forced Pecola to live in a fantasy world as she ultimately comes to believe her wish has been granted. As the novel ends, Pecola goes mad and manufactures an imaginary friend who becomes her only conversation partner.


The central character in Toni Morrison's novel The Bluest Eye is Pecola Breedlove, a young girl who prays for blue eyes, as she sees blue eyes as a symbol of beauty. Pecola has grown up in the home of an abusive father and a neglectful mother. The town she lives in is full of people who mock and degrade her, including classmates and other children who claimed to be her friend. This constant teasing and abuse, plus the nonexistent self-esteem of both her parents, leads Pecola to believe she is ugly. She also comes to believe that if she were granted blue eyes, she would be beautiful, and no one would tease or torment her anymore.
Pecola does not give her own appearance much thought beyond categorizing herself as ugly, and her low self-esteem is reinforced by the people surrounding her. Pecola fervently wishes to change her appearance, believing this will lead her to a happier, and more acceptable, sense of identity. By the end of the story, Pecola cannot take any more abuse and degradation, and she goes insane. She believes herself to have been granted blue eyes and spends the rest of her days talking to an imaginary friend about how beautiful her new blue eyes are. In her madness, Pecola's entire sense of identity has shifted, and she believes wholeheartedly that this new identity is the key to beauty.

Which factors led to the declaration of World War I?

Several factors led to the declaration of World War I. The immediate cause was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, by Serbian nationalist Gavrilo Princip on June 28, 1914. Therefore, nationalism, or a feeling of patriotism about one's own country or ethnic group, was one of the factors that led to the declaration of war. Serbian nationalist groups wanted to unite all Slavs in one country, an effort supported by Russia (a country that also had a number of Slavic people) and opposed by Austria-Hungary.
In addition, strong feelings of nationalism among the major European powers--Italy, Austria-Hungary, Germany, Britain, France, and Russia, led these powers to develop their militaries and to be very willing to use them to promote their national strength. Therefore, militarism was another factor that led to the war. Connected to the concepts of nationalism and militarism, imperialism was also a factor in the war, as the European countries had been involved in competing to establish overseas colonies for access to raw materials and markets. Therefore, tensions were running high among them in the decades before the outbreak of the war. 
As a result of competitive nationalist sentiment among the European countries, the nations were undergoing shifting balance of power agreements and new alliances. France, wary of growing German strength after the German unification of 1871 and the Franco-Prussian War, allied itself with Russia in the Franco-Russian Alliance. England also allied itself with Russia with the Anglo-Russian Entente of 1907, and the three countries eventually formed the Triple Entente. England was also wary of Germany because Germany's growing naval power threatened English naval power. Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy formed the Triple Alliance, and countries in those alliances promised to defend each other if they were attacked. Therefore, when the assassination of Franz Ferdinand occurred, Russia backed Serbia, and Austria-Hungary eventually declared war on Serbia. Austria-Hungary was given a "blank check" by Germany (this blank check meant that Germany provided unconditional support for Austria-Hungary). As a result, the major countries of Europe were all drawn into the war.
 

Who is Macduff?

Lord Macduff is the Thane of Fife and plays a pivotal role in Shakespeare's classic play, Macbeth. After King Duncan's assassination, Macduff becomes suspicious of Macbeth and is the first to question why he killed the chamberlains. Macduff then leaves his family behind in Scotland and travels to England in order to offer his support and allegiance to Malcolm, the rightful heir to the Scottish throne. Lord Macduff is depicted as a rather quiet, discerning man, who is extremely loyal to King Duncan and his son. Macduff is also portrayed as an emotional man, who laments the terrible situation in Scotland and is overwhelmed with sadness after learning that Macbeth slaughtered his entire family. Macduff acts as Macbeth's foil and carries out the witches' prophecies when he returns to Scotland to battle Macbeth. Macduff leads Malcolm's army and ends up decapitating Macbeth in the final battle. Before Macduff kills Macbeth, he explains that he was "Untimely ripped" from his mother's womb, which coincides with the witches' earlier prophecy. Overall, Macduff plays an important role in the play and acts as Macbeth's foil. Macduff proves his allegiance to Malcolm and helps restore him to his rightful throne by defeating Macbeth.


Macduff is a Scottish noble who holds the title of Thane of Fife. He is one of the first to suspect Macbeth's treachery—though he does not voice his concerns, he notably declines to attend Macbeth's coronation. He is also the first to discover Duncan's murder, entering his room to find a bloody scene the morning after Macbeth has stabbed the king to death. He is most notable as the man who kills Macbeth, and it turns out that it is he who the witches have in mind when they tell Macbeth he has nothing to fear from anyone "of woman born." It turns out at the end of the play that Macduff was born by caesarean procedure. Not only that, but Macduff has his heart set on revenge after Macbeth sends his assassins to murder Macduff's family (Macduff having fled to England at the time). Returning with Malcolm, Macduff vanquishes Macbeth on the field of battle.

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

How is symbolism used in "A Little Cloud"?

Symbolism is used by Joyce to convey the general theme of "A Little Cloud" and the other stories in Dubliners: the restricted, provincial, suffocating nature of Irish life. The title of the story is itself symbolic. Little Chandler, in spite of his elevated ambitions of being a great poet, is just a little cloud in a much larger sky. He desperately wants to escape the stultifying boredom of his workaday existence but lacks the courage or ability to do so. So he floats along in life like a cloud, barely registering any kind of presence against the sky's expanse. A cloud can also symbolize the dreamy, hazy fantasy world that Chandler inhabits. His dreams of being a poet are precisely that; his head is permanently stuck in the clouds, unable to connect with the world around him.
Gallaher is also a symbolic figure, but at the same time incredibly real. In fact, he is considerably more real than Little Chandler. He is much more worldly, for one thing. Unlike his friend, Gallaher is actually living the dream, working as a successful journalist in London. He symbolizes the life that Chandler could have had if only he had the courage to take a chance and break free from Ireland.
Chandler's family could reasonably be seen as symbolic of Ireland at the time Joyce wrote the story. Home life is not a source of loving warmth for Chandler; it is a place of boredom, restriction, and lack of fulfillment. And the traditional Irish romanticizing of hearth and home has no appeal for Joyce, either. His eyes are firmly set upon being a great European writer, an artist of universal renown.
Chandler's poetry books gather dust on the shelf, unread, unloved, unappreciated. He wanted to read them to his wife, but he was always too shy to do so. Joyce too feels unappreciated by his fellow countrymen. But he is not too shy to bring his work to their critical attention. It is just that they would not understand it. His literary vision—so ambitious, so European, so un-Irish—is wasted on them.
The howls of derision and incomprehension that so often accompanied the reception of Joyce's work in Ireland are symbolically prefigured in the persistent bawling of Chandler's baby son. The child is too young to understand Chandler's poetic ambitions. And Ireland is too immature, too culturally insular, to appreciate the unique literary vision of James Joyce.

A car travels 2.21 km in the x-direction, then turns left 65.5◦ to the original direction and travels an additional distance of 1.78 km. Calculate the x component of the car’s net displacement. Let: d1=2.21 km, θ = 65.5◦ d2 = 1.78 km . Answer in units of km.

The initial displacement of the car on the x-axis is 
2.21 km (East).
The car then turns left bearing at an angle of 65.5 degrees from East, to now travel NE.
It then travels 1.78 km in that new direction.
To find the negative displacement on the x-axis following this change of course, we can use the trigonometric relation
cos (theta) = A/H
where x is the angle between the adjacent side A of the triangle and the hypotenuse H of the triangle.
We already have theta = 65.5 degrees and H = 1.78 km
Solving for the length A, we obtain the positive displacement on the x-axis.
A = cos (65.5) x H = 0.41469 x 1.78 = 0.7382 km
Adding this from the initial displacement of the car on the x-axis we find that the final resulting net displacement on the x-axis is.
2.21 km + 0.7382 km = 2.9482 km
The net displacement of the car on the x-axis is 2.9482 km.
 
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zsgjxfr/revision/1

Specifically, this discussion question calls for an analysis of the legal concepts of minimum wage, the employment-at-will doctrines, and the law as it relates to those issues in other states. Are you persuaded that the United States has the superior legal system regarding the aforementioned concepts? If so, why? If not, why? If you prefer another system, why? What would be the logical consequence of adopting such a policy in the United States? Prior to answering these questions, please review the following short articles to inform your opinion. Feel free to cite from the articles to support your position. https://www.tlnt.com/employment-at-will-it-doesnt-apply-to-workers-outside-the-u-s/

First, we will discuss the employment-at-will and minimum wage laws in the US.
As of 2017, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) states that the federal minimum wage must be at least $7.25/hr for most workers. Two interesting exceptions pertain to restaurant industry and youth workers. For example, employers of tipped employees need only set direct wages at $2.13/hr. However, direct wages and earned tips must be equal to the federally-mandated minimum wage. If they do not, employers must make up the difference.
As for youth workers under the age of 20, the FLSA mandates that they should be paid $4.25/hr for the first 90 consecutive days of employment. After the 90-day period or when the employee turns 20 (whichever comes first), the employer must pay the federally-mandated minimum wage of $7.25/hr. Minimum wage laws also differ between states in the US. As of 2017, 19 states have higher minimum wages. When there is a discrepancy between state and federal law, the employee is entitled to be paid whichever of the per-hour rate is higher.
There are also rules pertaining to how employers should address rest periods, mealtimes, and job-related travel. In the US, there are laws that explicitly state what compensable hours are. 
Now, we'll discuss the employment-at-will laws in the US. As the article mentions, the US is likely the only country that is governed by an employment-at-will law. However, "at-will" is defined specifically: employers can fire or dismiss employees for any reason or no reason at all, provided that the reason is not an illegal one. Furthermore, the at-will rule can be modified by contract. Here's something that may surprise you: there are exceptions to at-will presumption. Please refer to the link I have provided above for more details. To summarize:
1) Public Policy Exception
Employers cannot fire or dismiss employees for any of the 4 reasons: engaging in duties that are in the public interest, refusing to violate the law, reporting a violation of the law, and exercising a statutory right.
2) Implied Contract Exception
Even when there is no fixed contract, an employee can have an expectation of indefinite employment, especially if the employer is known to only dismiss employees for just cause or if the employer has specific termination policies in place.
3) Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
Some states recognize this covenant. This means that an employer cannot fire an employee out of malice or in bad faith. A bad faith termination can be something as simple as an employer firing an older employee to avoid paying retirement benefits.
4) Additional Tort-Based Claims Limiting At-Will Employment
Here, an employee can bring claims against an employer for two torts: intentional inteference with a contract or intentional infliction of emotional distress. The latter must require iron-clad proof to actually be prosecuted successfully in a court of law.
5) Promissory Estoppel
An employer can be denied the right to fire an employee, particularly if there is a clear promise of employment or if the employee is injured as a result of being dismissed. This last exception is extremely difficult to prove in a court of law.
Now, for the laws in other countries. As of 2017, 22 of 28 EU countries have a statutory minimum wage. The 6 countries that do not currently have a minimum wage are Finland, Denmark, Italy, Sweden, Cyprus, and Austria. In the link I provided, you'll find information about the differing minimum wage levels in the 22 EU countries.
As your article states, there are heavy penalties in Europe for firing employees without just cause. Additionally, even if an European employer fires an employee for just cause, he/she still has to provide severance pay to the employee. There are very few reasons where the employer won't have to make severance payments. Additionally, European employers are required to provide their employees with written employment contracts.
Here is another link that provides more information about how countries in Europe handle employment contracts or minimum wage requirements. 
After comparing the information, you may be able to decide whether the US has a superior or inferior legal system pertaining to these matters.
https://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/2013/04/07/european-employment-law-101-employment-at-will-is-truly-a-foreign-concept/

Monday, November 28, 2016

How does Emily Dickinson treat death in her poem "Because I could not stop for Death"?

In the poem "Because I could not stop for Death," Dickinson treats death as a person.  Giving human traits and qualities to nonhuman things and ideas is a common literary technique.  It is called personification, and it is a main literary technique used in this poem. 
In reality, death marks the end of a biological life.  It is a moment.  It does not have a personality, but Dickinson changes that in this poem.  She turns death into a person.  Treating death as a person is not a new idea. However, Dickinson definitely bucks the traditional personification of death.  Most readers might think of Death as an old guy dressed in all black who carries a scythe, but Dickinson portrays Death as a kindly gentleman.  He pulls his carriage up to her and kindly picks her up.  The two of them then casually and calmly ride through the town's streets.  The poem creates a beautiful image of Death and makes the carriage ride seem similar to a date between two lovers.  

We slowly drove—He knew no haste 
And I had put away 
My labor and my leisure too, 
For His Civility— 

Use details from Old Yeller to describe Arliss.

Arliss is Travis's little brother. We are told in chapter one that Arliss is five years old, and readers will learn throughout the story that Arliss is a fairly typical stock little brother. He loves Travis dearly, and he looks up to his older brother with deep affection and respect. However, that doesn't mean Arliss doesn't bug his older brother.

I said: “Arliss! You get out of that water.”
Arliss turned and stuck out his tongue at me.
“I’ll cut me a sprout!” I warned.
All he did was stick out his tongue at me again and splash water in my direction.

The above quote does a nice job of showing how Arliss likes to intentionally get Travis going, but it also shows that Arliss can be a great mixture of mischievous and hilarious. In addition to those traits, Arliss is a very confident five-year-old boy who is not ashamed of his body. For example, Travis eventually chases Arliss out of the water, and a completely naked Arliss runs into the house screaming "bloody murder." Finally, Arliss is a brave and fiercely protective boy. He is this way with his family and with Old Yeller.

He ran past me and fell on the dog and petted him till he quit howling, then turned on me, fighting mad.
“You quit kicking my dog!” he yelled fiercely. “You kick my dog, and I’ll wear you to a frazzle!”
The battling stick that Mama used to beat the dirt out of clothes when she washed stood leaning against the wall. Now, Little Arliss grabbed it up in both hands and came at me, swinging.
It was such a surprise move, Little Arliss making fight at me that way, that I just stood there with my mouth open and let him clout me a good one before I thought to move.

Why does Miss Strangeworth mail her letters at the post office after it has closed?

Miss Strangeworth mails her letters after the post office has closed because she doesn't want anyone in town to discover her identity as the writer of those anonymous, cruel letters.
One can speculate that Miss Strangeworth isn't exactly proud of her letter-writing activities; instead, she prefers to think of this "unpleasant" task as a moral crusade of sorts. Essentially, Miss Strangeworth's sanctimonious attitude speaks of her utter contempt for those who do not subscribe to her moral views.
In the story, we are told that Miss Strangeworth likes to make her way to the post office just as darkness has begun to dim the outlines of the trees. It's far easier for her to obscure the colored letters from human view at that time.
Although there is always a group of young people gathered around the post office, Miss Strangeworth pays them little attention. The children always let Miss Strangeworth pass; as a rule, they usually stand at a respectful distance when she slips the letters into the slot at the post office door.
So, the combination of dim surroundings and the children's natural deference provides Miss Strangeworth cover for her clandestine mission.


Miss Strangeworth appears on the surface to be a harmless little old lady. In reality, however, she is a thoroughly unpleasant character, who, among other things, acts and feels like she owns the town. After all, her grandfather built the first house on Pleasant Street, a fact she often shares with tourists passing through town who stop and admire her roses. She is also an interfering old busybody, dispensing homely advice to all on her daily rounds.
After Miss Strangeworth returns home she retreats to the genteel tranquility of her pretty sitting room. Here, at her writing desk, she composes a series of vicious poison-pen letters addressed to various townsfolk. She always mails them at the new post office, "shiny with red brick and silver letters." Additionally, she always makes sure to time her visits to coincide with the onset of darkness. By doing this, she is much less likely to be exposed as the writer of all those horrid little letters. However, the best-laid plans do not always go according to plan, as Miss Strangeworth is soon to discover.

Sunday, November 27, 2016

What kind of changes in working conditions were seen after the Industrial Revolution?

Prior to the Industrial Revolution, most production took place on a very small scale. One household might grow their own food, grow fibers for cloth, weave their own cloth, and even make their own furniture. The invention of a number of industrial machines both cut down on production times and made it possible for one person to produce far more than they could ever consume. In the pre-industrial setting of household production, a person could exercise almost total control over their own labor. Of course, they had to work in accordance with the seasons and their needs, but they held far more autonomy than was later seen in a factory setting.
The transition of labor to factory settings removed people from their household unit of production and, in exchange for a wage, engaged them in highly repetitive tasks on a line of production. On a household basis, a person might be involved from start to finish in producing goods. In the factory, that same person would be doing one part of production over and over all day. Such repetitive tasks often resulted in bodily pains or illness from long periods of sitting or standing, hand-sewing, or exposure to dangerous materials. 
In addition to these work-related illnesses, there was an added risk of injury in the factory setting. Early on, many people were injured while using or trying to repair machines. Children were often employed in factories because they were small enough to fit inside of delicate machinery and could be paid a lesser wage than an adult. 
With so many people working in one tight, and usually poorly ventilated space, illness was a major problem in working conditions. The Industrial Revolution brought people to the city seeking work, but housing and accommodations couldn't always keep up. Many working class people lived in tiny apartments shared with other families, and during the day they would go to work in an equally crowded factory. If just one person brought an illness like the flu, cholera, or tuberculosis to work from their apartment, it could take out the entire workforce and their families. 
The period immediately following the Industrial Revolution saw terrible depreciation of working conditions as spaces became more cramped, dirty, and inhospitable to human health. Over time, workers began fighting back against such poor treatment and developed labor unions. These unions fought for things like fair pay, limits on working hours, clean working conditions, safer machinery, and child labor laws. Today, most people working in an industrial setting experience a higher amount of risk than someone who has an office job, but it is leagues better than compared to the conditions during and immediately after the Revolution.
http://teachersinstitute.yale.edu/curriculum/units/1981/2/81.02.06.x.html

https://www.britannica.com/event/Industrial-Revolution

Saturday, November 26, 2016

1. What was the eugenics movement of the 1920s? Where did it come from? What did it call for? Who supported it? Why was it supported? What was the finding of the Supreme Court in relation to it? • Introduction – The darker side of progressivism. Note what Progressivism was (1905- 1920ish). The 1920s = modernism and new scientific approaches as well as cultural conflicts • Eugenics was and called for………. • Eugenics laws were passed • Eugenic laws were tested………..Buck vs Bell………..to the supreme court and found constitutional and valid • Conclusion – What does this teach us/you? What is your reaction to this movement and this moment in history. Be thoughtful

The eugenics movement can be traced back to 1877, when Richard Dugdale published his findings regarding the Juke family. The Juke family had a long-standing familial history of criminal activity, as well as mental illness. After studying the Jukes, Dugdale created a hypothesis regarding inherited traits. Dugdale argued that if emotional and mental traits could be inherited in the same way that physical traits could be, then why could not “superior” traits be inherited in the same way? In essence, the eugenics movement urged the breeding of humans in much the same way racehorses or show dogs were bred; superior traits were desired, so humans with those traits should breed in order to ensure those traits passed to their offspring.
Many influential Americans supported the eugenics movement, such as Charles Lindbergh and Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
The U.S. Supreme Court Case Buck v. Bell (1927), written by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., upheld a Virginia statute that allowed the state to forcibly sterilize “mentally unfit” patients at the state hospital. Bell, the superintendent of the Virginia hospital, argued that Carrie Buck needed to be sterilized to prevent her mental illness from passing to any offspring that she might have in the future. The Supreme Court upheld the Virginia statute, arguing that forced sterilization helped to protect the citizens and overall health of the state. Buck v. Bell has never been overturned. However, the Supreme Court case Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942) made sterilizations much harder to legally justify.
The eugenics movement lasted until the 1930s when it became associated with Nazism and Nazi Germany. Critics of the eugenics movement argued that the similarities between the eugenics movement and the speeches and actions of Hitler and the Nazis were too frightening, especially as news of the forced sterilizations in Germany began to spread. As a result of this association, the eugenics movement is now associated with “scientific racism.”

What is the climax of the story "A Jury of Her Peers"?

The climax of Susan Glaspell's "A Jury of Her Peers," the moment of highest emotional intensity, occurs when Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale decide to hide the damning evidence of the dead bird.
Because of the remarks of the rather flippant county attorney and the chiming in by the other men, Mrs. Peters who is the wife of the sheriff, and Mrs. Hale who is a neighbor of the suspect, Minnie Foster, are rather resentful of the attitude that there are "just kitchen things" on the first floor. Other patronizing remarks such as Sheriff Peter's sarcasm about the women's being worried about Mrs. Foster's preserves also prompts the action of the climax.
In the course of looking around, Mrs. Hale finds a quilt that Minnie Foster was making which has neat stitching except for the last part that has erratic stitches. A perfectionist with regard to sewing, Mrs. Hale feels compelled to resew this part despite Mrs. Peters's fear that they should not touch things. Then, while Mrs. Peters looks for some paper with which to tie up the clothes and articles that Mrs. Foster has requested be brought to the jail, she finds a damaged bird cage whose one hinge has been pulled apart.

Their eyes met--startled, questioning, apprehensive. For a moment neither stirred or spoke.

Further, as Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale search in the kitchen cupboards for quilt pieces because of their decision to give the quilt to Mrs. Foster so that she can finish it, the women discover a pretty red box. Inside this box is something wrapped in a piece of silk. "It's the bird," Mrs. Peter whispers. "Somebody wrung its neck."
Clearly, the women have discovered subtle, but damning evidence regarding the murder of Mr. Foster. For, he was choked to death by a rope around his neck in the same fashion in which the poor bird has died. This bird's death has most likely been avenged by Mrs. Foster because it was the one thing in her desperate and lonely life that brought her any joy.Soon after this discovery by the women left in the kitchen, the men descend the stairs. Once again, the county attorney jokes about the kitchen and its contents when the sheriff asks him if he needs to look through what Mrs. Peters has gathered to take to Mrs. Foster at the jail. In fact, it is with dramatic irony that the attorney facetiously replies, "I guess they're not very dangerous things the ladies have picked out."
Climax:
The county attorney's remarks precipitate the climax of the story:After the attorney and the sheriff leave the kitchen to examine the windows and Mr. Hale goes out to tend the horses who have been waiting in the cold, the tension of the thoughts and emotions between Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters is high as they look into each other's eyes, and Mrs. Hale turns her eyes to the red box. Mrs. Peters rushes to the box, covering it with the quilt; she tries to put it in her purse, but the purse is too small. At the sound of a door knob turning,

Martha Hale snatched the box from the sheriff's wife, and got it in the pocket of her big coat just as the sheriff and the country attorney came back into the kitchen.

Friday, November 25, 2016

Explain your plan to prevent crime statistic manipulation by the NYPD (New York Police Department).

A 2012 study by criminologist Eli Silverman and retired police captain John Eterno found evidence of widespread crime report manipulation amongst NYPD officers. The officers downgraded crimes and encouraged people to file reports of lesser crimes using a computer system called CompStat to compile this data.
There are several different ways that the police might implement reforms to reduce the probability of crime statistic manipulation. For example, an outside agency might be required to verify the statistics independently. When police are filing crime reports, these reports might have to be validated by this outside agency. The outside agency could validate each report or carry out spot checks of certain reports to make sure that the police are reporting crime data accurately.
In addition, many critics, including Silverman, have suggested that the NYPD stop measuring its success merely based on numbers. It is this culture that makes cops feel pressured not to report crimes or to downgrade the seriousness of crime when compiling reports. Instead, Silverman suggests, the NYPD might measure its success in other ways, such as by professionalism or its adherence to the Constitution. You might have other ideas about how to prevent crime statistic manipulation by the NYPD.

from an instructional standpoint, what do you believe to be the four of the most important quotes in Fahrenheit 451? Excerpt and record each. Support each quote with reasons why it is noteworthy.

Different teachers are probably going to choose a slightly different set of 4 quotes depending on that teacher's personal reaction toward the book or personal teaching strengths.  
I think Beatty has some great quotes, but I'll limit him to one quote.  The following quote is from part 2 of the book.  

"What traitors books can be! You think they’re backing you up, and then they turn on you. Others can use them, too, and there you are, lost in the middle of the moor, in a great welter of nouns and verbs and adjectives."

The quote is important because Beatty's quote points out exactly why books and literature are awesome. They force readers to think. 
Montag has a lot of great quotes that could easily be used in the classroom. The following quote is from part 1, and it is eerily similar to Beatty's quote.  

"You weren't there, you didn't see," he said. "There must be something in books, things we can't imagine, to make a woman stay in a burning house; there must be something there. You don't stay for nothing."

Beatty thinks that books are all nonsense because they don't expressly tell you what an answer is. The woman from Montag's quote is the opposite of Beatty.  She doesn't see the books and their questions as nonsense. She sees them as worth dying for.  
As a literature teacher, I really like the following quote of Montag from part 2. 

"Nobody listens any more. I can't talk to the walls because they're yelling at me. I can't talk to my wife; she listens to the walls. I just want someone to hear what I have to say. And maybe if I talk long enough, it'll make sense. And I want you to teach me to understand what I read."

I like this quote for two reasons. The first is that it points out a basic desire of humans. We are social. Montag longs to be in conversation with people about his thoughts, ideas, and dreams; however, neither the television nor his wife are capable of giving him an intellectual relationship. The second reason I like this quote is that is points out a basic need for teachers and experts. Montag may know how to read, but he isn't sure how to interpret what he is reading. He needs a teacher to help him better learn. It shows that teaching and learning is best done in a community setting.  
The final quote occurs during a conversation/argument between Montag and his wife.  

"Let me alone," said Mildred. "I didn't do anything." "Let you alone! That's all very well, but how can I leave myself alone? We need not to be let alone. We need to be really bothered once in a while. How long is it since you were really bothered? About something important, about something real?"

The quote is a great quote to use in class because it points out that in order to really know that a person is happy, that person needs to experience sadness. You can't have the highs if you don't know what the lows feel like. Mildred doesn't get this. She is like many other characters in the novel. Their attempt to never feel sadness or be bothered by things prevents them from ever really being happy as well.  

When did Zimbabwe start experiencing political violence?

Zimbabwe enjoyed relative peace for many years between the post-colonial transition from Rhodesia to its current iteration. Political violence started to become a serious problem, however, during the late 1990s when long-time dictator Robert Mugabe continued to obstruct efforts by opposition politicians to allow free and fair elections. Mugabe had succeeded in consolidating power following the 1979 transition to majority black rule, mainly through out-maneuvering and physically marginalizing his main opponent for political power, Joshua Nkomo (the two men had led competing factions of black militants fighting the legacy of British colonialism and minority white rule.) Most of the late 1980s and 1990s, then, were relatively peaceful. Mugabe had defeated his enemies and was imposing socialist political and economic systems on Zimbabwe. Political violence resurfaced, however, during the late 1990s when economic mismanagement precipitated riots and the emergence of an opposition political party, the Movement for Democratic Change, whose leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, a one-time Mugabe ally, sought to force democratic changes. Ultimately, Mugabe was able to repress the democratic movement and reestablish absolute power. Until, that it, very recently.
In the intervening years between the early-2000s, when Mugabe was repressing opposition political movements, and the present, when economic mismanagement continued to fuel social unrest, he repeatedly oversaw sham elections in which he was “reelected” president of Zimbabwe. Tsvangirai, however, continued to be a major player in the nation’s turbulent political scene, despite Mugabe’s repeated efforts at marginalizing and persecuting him.
As Mugabe grew older, his paranoia—the paranoia that tends to occupy the minds of increasingly isolated and autocratic rulers—intensified. The country’s economy continued to deteriorate, and hyper-inflation set in, with the consequent rise in political and social instability that eventually forced Mugabe from power. By late summer 2016, the situation became untenable. Public discord, including rioting, increased while Mugabe resisted calls for his resignation. Finally, in November 2017, the Zimbabwean military stepped in and forced Mugabe to resign and to vacate the presidential residency.
All this history is provided for the purpose of explaining why it is difficult to provide an exact date for when political violence began in Zimbabwe. Violence never really completely left post-independence Zimbabwe because of the dictatorial proclivities of Robert Mugabe. If one were to offer a possible answer, however, one could suggest that the violence during and following the thoroughly-corrupted elections of 2008 marked the beginning of the end, or, more recently, that the rioting that precipitated the November 2017 military take-over is the answer to the question. Over 20 years of political violence resulting from Mugabe’s inability to manage his country’s economy and marked ability at remaining in power provide multiple possible dates to the question when the violence began.

College Algebra, Chapter 10, 10.3, Section 10.3, Problem 52

In the 6/49 lottery game a player selects six numbers from 1 to 49. What is the probability of selecting at least five of the six winning numbers?


$
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}

P(\text{selecting at least 5 of the 6 winning numbers}) =& P(\text{getting exactly 5 of the 6 winning numbers})
\\
\\
=& \frac{C(6,5) C(43,1) }{C(49,6)} + \frac{C(6,6) C(43,0)}{C(49,6)}

\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
$



One must divide the number of combinations producing the given result by the total number of possible combinations. So $49 C 6 = 13,983,816$. The numerator equates to the number of ways one ca select the winning numbers multiplied by the number of ways one can select the losing numbers. For a score of $n$, there are $6 Cn$ ways of selecting $n$ winning numbers from the $6$ winning numbers. This means that there are $6-n$ losing numbers, which are chosen from the $43$ losing numbers in $43 C(6-n)$ ways. So the probability of selecting at least 5 of the 6 winning numbers is $\displaystyle \frac{37}{1997688} = 0.0000185$.

How does Tom's life change as a result of his ordeal on the ledge?

Tom changes because he realizes that that there are more important things in life than work. But what he really comes to understand is how desperately foolish he is. First of all, his decision to go out on the ledge to retrieve his notes is very stupid. Finney is very much concerned with recording the details of Tom's inner state out on the ledge, and mostly what Tom is thinking about is how to keep his balance. But it's also pretty clear that Tom regrets his decision to climb out his window. Not only is this decision foolish, but he comes to realize that his ambition—his project to develop new grocery store displays—is not very important either. There is a kind of arrogance in the importance Tom assigns to his notes, as well as in his obsession with his career. Even though he knows that this side project will not get him a promotion, he is still compelled to do it, and the thought of duplicating months of research is more than he can bear.
I think, in the end, what Tom realizes is that his love for his wife is more important than his personal ambition. It's not clear from the story that he has become any less self-centered: his motivation to find his wife at the movie theatre could be interpreted as having less to do with her than with his desire to add more pleasure to his life. The final bit, where the paper he endured so much to preserve flies out the broken window, is ironic: he laughs at his own foolishness.


"In the Contents of the Dead Man's Pockets" Tom Benecke has a revelation about the direction of his life and his misguided use of time.
Early in the story, Tom is focused on advancing his career at the expense of his relationship with his wife and his enjoyment of leisure activities. He spent most of his non-working hours doing research on an idea for making the grocery industry more efficient. Instead of balancing his work life with his home life, he put his relationship with his wife on hold, promising her things would be better when his idea came to fruition. His life was out of balance.
After his ordeal on the ledge, which represented a near death experience, Tom realized his transgression. As he hung on the ledge, he realized how insignificant his life was, and how important his wife was to him. Once off the ledge, he rushed off to be with his wife as she enjoyed a movie. This is symbolic of his new appreciation for life and relationships.

Thursday, November 24, 2016

In the book The Once and Future King, what was the lesson the Wart learned as a goose?

In The Once and Future King, Wart learns from the geese to not idealize war, underscoring the theme that might is not right. He learns primarily from a goose named Lyo-lyok. When Wart asks her if the geese are at war, Lyo-lyok misunderstands the core of Wart's question: 

“Fighting?” she asked doubtfully. “The men fight sometimes, about their wives and that. Of course there is no bloodshed—only scuffling, to find the better man. Is that what you mean?” (White 169).

When Wart clarifies that he means war and battle, not just "scuffling," Lyo-lyok grows angry and answers sharply: 

“What a horrible mind you must have! You have no right to say such things. And of course there are sentries. There are the jer-falcons and the peregrines, aren’t there: the foxes and the ermines and the humans with their nets? These are natural enemies. But what creature could be so low as to go about in bands, to murder others of its own blood?” (White 170). 

Lyo-lyok remains angry, offended, and confused, especially when Wart asks about if the geese fight each other over boundaries. She highlights that boundaries are just “imaginary lines on the earth” that hold no weight (White 170). She emphasizes that other war-hungry creatures—like humans and ants—would undergo a radical change of heart if they could only zoom out, see the world from the skies, and realize that there are no such things as boundaries (and, in turn, recognize that these artificially imposed territories are no reason to fight one another).
Lyo-lyok’s reaction to war sharply contrasts with that of Wart—who, even after being lectured on the atrocities of killing one’s own kind, still says, “I like fighting. . . . It is knightly” (White 170). Lyo-lyok answers plainly, “[You like war] Because you’re a baby,” pointing out that Wart's idealization of war stems from his immaturity (White 170).

How and why did the indigenous people arrive in the Caribbean?

Let me first address the "why" part of your question, as the "how" will be a little more complex. Most human migration, especially prior to the Modern period, was driven by a need or desire for resources. Even well into the Modern period, First Nations people (like the indigenous Taino and Arawak) lived highly mobile lifestyles driven by access to seasonal resources. So, why did indigenous Caribbeans migrate there? For access to food and other resources!
As I mentioned, the "how" is a little more tricky. We do not have historical records detailing the peopling of the Americas and must rely on archaeological materials and "best guesses." Archaeological evidence indicates that people were living in Trinidad at least eight thousand years ago, and by seven thousand years ago were continually pushing north towards Cuba. Based on this evidence, we could infer that once groups of people had arrived in South America, they began pushing northward into the islands of the Caribbean. There is also evidence to suggest that people migrated south from present-day Florida or east from the Yucatan peninsula.
How did these people get to the Caribbean islands? Based on the sea-floor geography and fluctuations in sea levels, they might've been able to walk or wade easily from one area to another! It is also possible that these people were building rafts or boats and using them to cross longer distances. It is rather unlikely that the peopling of the Caribbean was accomplished entirely by swimming, even though it is possible to swim for long distances. Children, the elderly, and the infirm would not have been able to make such long swims, so the use of a boat or raft would have been needed.
https://www.archaeology.org/news/3504-150722-americas-genetic-migration

https://www.britannica.com/place/Caribbean-Sea

https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/indigenous-people-caribbean

What is the mood in the poem "To a Waterfowl" by William Cullen Bryant?

The mood of William Cullen Bryant's "To a Waterfowl" is contemplative and reverent. In the opening stanza, the speaker asks the bird where it goes at sunset. In the next, he observes that a hunter would be unable to harm it. In the third stanza, the speaker speculates on places the bird might go. In the fourth stanza, the speaker states that a "Power," presumably divine, guides the bird. The fifth stanza observes that the bird is protected and sustained on its long journey, and the sixth predicts that the bird will find a new home among its companions at the end of its journey. In the second to last stanza, the bird has disappeared from view, but the speaker knows he has learned a lasting lesson from it. The final stanza reveals the lesson: the same "Power" that guides the bird will guide him through his life as well. It is a poem about faith in God being affirmed in nature, so the mood is reflective.

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Detail the events that happen in Oedipus Rex?

Oedipus Rex is a play set in the ancient Greek city of Thebes. As with many Greek tragedies, the events actually portrayed on stage are caused by things that happened in the past, some of which would have been known to the audience from mythology and some of which are gradually revealed over the course of the play.
Oedipus's parents were King Laius and Queen Jocasta. Laius, during a period of civil strife in Thebes was raised in the court of Pelops (part of another of the cursed dynasties who are the subject of many tragedies), but ended up raping and abducting Pelops' son. The gods cursed Laius to bearing a son who would kill him and marry Jocasta.
At the beginning of the play, Oedipus is king of Thebes, and married to Jocasta. A great plague has befallen Thebes, brought about by a divine curse. Creon, who is the brother of Jocasta, goes to the oracle of Apollo to find out the cause of the curse and returns to tell Oedipus that to lift the curse, Oedipus must find the murderer of Laius. The blind seer Teiresias first urges Oedipus not to delve into the issue and then, in an argument, states that Oedipus himself is to blame for the plague.
The audience then finds out that Laius was murdered by robbers at a place where three roads met in Phocis. Oedipus then reveals that although he was raised as the son of Polybus of Corinth and Merope, he later heard rumors that he was adopted. He also remembers the incident at the crossroads where he did kill an old man. As Oedipus delves more deeply into his own past, he finds out that in fact he was a foundling, adopted by the childless rulers of Corinth. Next, the audience discovers that when Jocasta bore a son, Laius, to avoid the prophecy of his being killed by his own son, asked a servant to take the baby and expose it on a hillside. Instead, the servant gave the baby to a shepherd who in turn gave it to the Corinthian royal family. That baby was Oedipus.
Jocasta, horrified by this information, hangs herself. Oedipus blinds himself by stabbing his eyes with pins from Jocasta's dress and abdicates. Creon takes over as king, agrees to look after Oedipus's daughters, and leads Oedipus offstage.

What is the theme of Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye?

A theme of a work of literature is the message the author would like to convey. Most pieces of literature—especially novels—have multiple themes. When stating the theme of a novel, it is important that you can support that theme with details from the text. I will briefly go over some possible themes for The Catcher in the Rye.
Alienation from society: Holden constantly pushes people away. He has a hard time understanding people and fitting in with society. He calls most people “phonies” for behaving in ways that he does not believe are completely genuine, which is ironic because he has a penchant for lying. When he meets with Sally Hayes, he criticizes her for liking certain movies. He says of the movie they are going to see:

I didn't much want to see it, but I knew old Sally, the queen of the phonies, would start drooling all over the place when I told her I had tickets for that, because the Lunts were in it and all. She liked shows that are supposed to be very sophisticated and dry and all, with the Lunts and all. I don't.

Holden goes on to say that he doesn’t like most actors because they are fake. His inability to understand and enjoy the things most people around him enjoy makes it difficult for him to fit in. He's so hard on people for being "phony" or conforming with society that he manages to constantly push people away.
Loss of innocence: Throughout the novel, Holden is preoccupied with preserving the innocence of children, especially his younger sister, Phoebe. This is where the novel gets its title. When Pheobe asks Holden what he wants to be when he grows up, he responds:

I keep picturing all these little kids playing some game in this big field of rye and all. Thousands of little kids, and nobody's around--nobody big, I mean--except me. And I'm standing on the edge of some crazy cliff. What I have to do, I have to catch everybody if they start to go over the cliff--I mean if they're running and they don't look where they're going I have to come out from somewhere and catch them. That's all I'd do all day. I'd just be the catcher in the rye and all. I know it's crazy, but that's the only thing I'd really like to be. I know it's crazy.

His desire to be the “catcher in the rye” symbolizes his desire to protect childhood innocence and keep young people away from harm.
The search for human connection: Ironically, though Holden pushes people away, he spends much of the novel searching for a real human connection. He mentions wanting to call up various people, especially his old friend, Jane, just so that he can interact with someone he understands. When he is looking for his sister, Phoebe, in the park, he comes across a girl whose ice skate he helps tighten. He even tries to spend more time with her, showing his desperation to talk to someone he doesn't see as "phony":

I asked her if she'd care to have a hot chocolate or something with me, but she said no, thank you. She said she had to meet her friend. Kids always have to meet their friend. That kills me.

He doesn’t see that it is odd that he, a teenager, would ask a little kid to go for hot chocolate with him, but it’s because his intentions are innocent. He simply wants to connect.

Who is the hero of The Merchant of Venice? Discuss.

A hero in literary terms is the main character in a work who fights adversity through bravery, ingenuity, or strength. Regarding this definition, Portia is not a true hero. Although she manages to save Antonio's life, she does not face any danger. She, in fact, uses her privileged position and high-ranking contacts to disguise herself as a lawyer and intervene in Antonio's trial. Her ingenuity saves the day and harshly punishes Shylock for daring to harm a Venetian citizen. At no point in the play does Portia encounter danger or risk.
The one who is indeed at risk is Antonio. Since the play revolves mostly around his situation, which affects the actions of most of the other characters, he is, most certainly, the main character. Antonio takes a huge risk by signing a bond with Shylock, a man he despises and who passionately hates him. Antonio is, however, bold enough to help his dearest friend in spite of the harsh terms of Shylock's loan agreement.
When he defaults on his agreement, Antonio seems to accept his fate and is prepared to die at Shylock's hands after the money-lender refuses to negotiate new terms. It is Antonio's willingness to die and his consequent generosity towards Shylock at the end of Act 4, in spite of the moneylender's failed attempt to kill him, that makes him a real hero.


Portia is the heroine of the play The Merchant of Venice. The wealthy, intelligent heiress from Belmont marries Bassanio and ends up saving his friend Antonio's life at the end of the play.
Antonio had borrowed money from Shylock to fund Bassanio's trip to Belmont, taking the loan out under the condition that he would pay it back with interest or else give Shylock a pound of his flesh. After Antonio forfeits on the loan because his ships are lost at sea, Bassanio returns to Venice in hopes of preventing Shylock from retrieving a pound of Antonio's flesh.
However, Portia ends up saving Antonio's life by secretly traveling to Venice and disguising herself as a young lawyer named Balthazar. Portia then presents a moving, logical argument, which prevents Shylock from retrieving the pound of flesh and taking Antonio's life. Portia's argument also punishes Shylock for his merciless, malevolent behavior. Overall, Portia is considered the play's heroine for preventing Shylock from murdering Antonio by taking a pound of his flesh. 

Why is the sinkhole going to be filled?

After he rapes and kills her, Mr. Harvey puts Susie's dismembered body parts into garbage bags. He locks the bags in a safe, which he then buries in a sinkhole. This makes it a very safe location for the disposal of a murder victim—one that will be very difficult to discover. The sinkhole is often used by local people to dump their garbage, so there's all kinds of stuff down there.
Later on in the story, Susie's friend Ruth—who's always had a strange fascination with the sinkhole—finds out that it's going to be filled in with concrete as part of a property development. This prompts her to go pay a visit. Much to the approval of Heaven's souls, Ruth regularly visits places where women and girls have been murdered, writing about them in her notebook.

Before starting the experiment, what does Dr. Heidegger remind each of his guests?

Dr. Heidegger's experiment is conducted with four willing participants: the Widow Wycherly, Colonel Killigrew, Mr. Medbourne, and Mr. Gascoigne.  All are of an advanced age and eager to try a substance he identifies as fluid from the Fountain of Youth. Because all four have made poor choices in their past and suffered negative consequences, Dr. Heidegger counsels them to use the wisdom gained from their life experience and "become patterns of virtue and wisdom to all the young people of the age!" Because Dr. Heidegger believes he understands human nature and expects that the four participants in his experiment will make the same mistakes, he offers this advice.
The four find his advice "ridiculous" and unnecessary; the implication is that anyone given the chance to relive their past would naturally sidestep their youthful mistakes and missteps to avoid trouble and regret.

What does Holden say about his mother and father in The Catcher in the Rye?

Holden Caulfield describes his mother as a hysterical woman who is extremely anxious and nervous all the time. She is still struggling to heal from the tragic death of her youngest son, Allie, and Holden sympathizes with her. He also says that feels bad for his mother after he drops out of Pencey and roams the lonely streets of New York City by himself.
Holden is not particularly close to his mother, which is revealed by the fact that she did not know that he wanted racing skates for Christmas or that he was infatuated with Jane Gallagher. He also mentions that his mother is a chain smoker and stays up smoking in the middle of the night. He says that his mother has a good sense of fashion and dresses Phoebe well. She is also a concerned parent who would cry and beg Holden to come back home if he ever ran away.
Holden describes his father as a touchy individual who wishes that he would attend Yale or Princeton later in life. Holden also mentions that his father is a wealthy, successful corporate lawyer. He invests his money into shows on Broadway but seems to have bad luck. Holden's father is a former Catholic and stopped going to mass after he married Holden’s mother. He is also a deep sleeper and would never wake up in the middle the night.
Overall, Holden has a strained relationship with his parents and is not very close to either of them. Holden's father seems to be more interested in his occupation, while his mother is struggling to accept Allie's tragic death.


It's fair to say that Holden has a less than ideal relationship with his parents, especially his mother. He describes Mrs. Caulfield in detailed terms as a very nervous, anxious woman. Permanently grief-stricken and beset by insomnia, she's finding it hard to get over Allie's death.
Although Holden doesn't get on very well with his mother, he nonetheless expresses guilt over adding to her worries by constantly getting kicked out of one school after another. He describes her initial reaction in such cases as hysterical but claims that she isn't so bad when she finally digests the bad news. Clearly, she's still preoccupied with the memory of her dead son.
As for Mr. Caulfield, Holden describes him with a degree of objectivity that indicates their emotional distance from one another. He tells us about how rich his old man is and what he does for a living. Holden vividly compares his dad's sleeping habits with those of Mrs. Caulfield:

You can hit my father over the head with a chair and he won't wake up, but my mother, all you have to do to my mother is cough somewhere in Siberia and she'll hear you. She's nervous as hell. Half the time she's up all night smoking cigarettes.

The implication here is that the death of Allie hasn't quite impacted Mr. Caulfield in the same way as his wife. The fact that he can sleep soundly at night speaks volumes.


Holden begins his story by describing his parents as private people who would be upset if they knew he disclosed anything about them; he claims they are "touchy about anything like that, especially my father."
When he decides to take some time alone before going home after his expulsion from Pencey, Holden clearly wants to avoid facing his parents. He says, "My mother gets very hysterical. She's not too bad after she gets something thoroughly digested, though." He understands that there will be a scene because he has to once again change schools.
Holden's family is wealthy; of his father, he says "My father's quite wealthy . . . he's a corporation lawyer." He describes his mother as "very nervous" in the aftermath of Allie's death. When Holden confides to Phoebe that he has left Pencey early, Phoebe tells him "Daddy s gonna kill you."
Holden does not share many of his parents' values. He doesn't enjoy urban living, and he rejects the idea of working like his father. He understands and empathizes with their concern for him, but he feels trapped by their expectations and their control over his life.

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

What are some characteristics of Victorian literature?

Queen Victoria (1819-1901) was Queen of the United Kingdom from 1837 until 1901, a period of more than sixty-three years. During this period, over 40,000 novels were published and numerous other volumes of prose and poetry. It was also a period of proliferation of periodical literature, with monthly magazines containing nonfiction, poetry, and serialized novels. Perhaps the most significant characteristic of the period was its diversity.
Fiction from this period includes novels and short stories. Novels were often first published in serial form, with one chapter a month appearing in magazines, and then republished in three-volume form. The development of railways led to a growth in smaller format and shorter books as well. Mass literacy gave rise to short, inexpensive sensationalistic works known as "penny dreadfuls." Three of the major movements influencing the novel were Romanticism, Naturalism, and Realism, although symbolist works and psychological novels became common at the end of the century.
The Victorian period was one in which many forms of poetry flourished, from the Romantic poems of the beginning of the period to ones attempting to reflect common speech and ordinary lives. The symbolist and decadent movements were important at the end of the century. Regional poetry and experimental verse forms, often influenced by French models, were also common.
In the early part of Victoria's reign, melodramas were a major dramatic genre. Revivals of Shakespeare were also common. The end of the century was distinguished by superb comic writers such as Shaw and Wilde, some realistic drama, and some experimental poetic drama. Irish drama flourished during this period, and ranged from the realistic to the poetic.

Is the market structure of the coffee industry in India a monopolistic competition? If no, which market structure is it?

Two industries that traditionally represent monopolistic competition are the beverage and restaurant industries because of the large number of providers and the large number of consumers demanding the products. The coffee industry in India is a monopolistic competition because it falls within these traditional industries and meets the defining characteristics of a monopolistic competition, including:

many businesses competing for the same customers.
the same product offered with unique differentiation or target groups.
businesses being price makers as each sets its own price and branding, from elite high-end to street-side walk-up.
consumer knowledge about the product being expansive but still imperfect until after consumption.
entry to the market by new competitors meeting few barriers (e.g., street carts can sell coffee with little start-up cost).

The coffee industry in India until recently was focused on supplying coffee for (mostly) European export. According to the India Brand Equity Foundation, India has been "the seventh-largest producer and fifth-largest exporter of coffee in the world." For the fiscal year of 2017-18, India's coffee production was "316,000 million tonnes." Because India traditionally is a tea drinking country, except in their southern states, "70 per cent is exported while the remaining 30 per cent is consumed domestically."Patterns began to change in India's domestic coffee consumption beginning in 2012 when Starbucks entered a "50:50 joint venture" with Indian coffee producer Tata Group and began selling Indian coffee in Starbucks shops in the U.S. Later in 2012, Starbucks entered the monopolistic competition of India's coffee industry by opening the first Indian Starbucks in Mumbai.
https://www.ibef.org/exports/coffee-industry-in-india.aspx

https://www.statista.com/statistics/670760/coffee-as-beverage-market-share-by-regions-india/


To explain why India’s coffee market is an example of monopolistic competition, we first need to define monopolistic competition and identify some of its key characteristics. Monopolistic competition is a type of imperfect competition in which many producers sell products that are differentiated from one another. In a monopolistic competition, a company charges the same price as its competitors. Characteristics of a monopolistic competition include the following: many producers and consumers in the market, no business with total control over the market price, few barriers to entry and exit, and producers who have some control over the price.
The case of the coffee market in India is unique. Most of the production of coffee happens in the southern state of Karnataka, and coffee production is concentrated in Southern India. There are a lot of government efforts to encourage research, marketing, and promotion of coffee as a product, as well as to protect workers and keep barriers to entry low for coffee producers. In this way, the producers have some control over the price and are protected by the government.
The coffee market in India is very different in the sense that there are some big established brands like Café Coffee Day, who operate like Starbucks and Costa Coffee do in the west. There are a lot of small coffee stalls run by young entrepreneurs who were able to set up due to the low barriers to entry. There are many coffee producers and consumers in the market, and while Café Coffee Day has a large portion of the market share (among those who can afford to shop there), they do not have total control over the coffee market. There are many coffee stalls that succeed in smaller towns and cities, where traditional filter coffee is preferred over espressos, cappuccinos, and lattes, which are found at Café Coffee Day.
https://www.ibef.org/exports/coffee-industry-in-india.aspx

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monopolisticmarket.asp


Monopolistic competition is a type of imperfect competition in which firms sell products that are differentiated from those of their competitors.  Product differentiation is typically achieved by monopolistic firms through the branding of their products with the use of logos and slogans, labels, and product packaging.
The market structure of the coffee industry in India is a monopolistic competition for the following reasons:
Product Differentiation - The coffee sold by each firm in India's coffee industry is differentiated by branding. Therefore, each coffee firm sells differentiated beverages such as hot chocolate, lattes, teas, espressos, and cappuccinos in labeled coffee cups and packaging. Furthermore, differentiated toppings such as whipped cream, sprinkles, and chocolate drizzle as well as differentiated pastry items such as muffins, soups, and sandwiches may also be offered.
Market Power - Each firm has some degree of market power in the coffee industry. Market power enables each firm to have control over their decision-making process in regards to the quantity of coffee to be produced and the selling price of each cup of coffee.  Therefore, each firm produces at a level that ensures profit maximization. For example, CoffeeHouse located in East India may choose to sell their dark coffee beverages for $1.50, whereas, CremeBeans located in the western part of India offers dark coffee beverages for $1.95.
Asymmetric Information - Information in the market is not perfectly distributed amongst sellers and buyers; as such, the price offered in coffee shops blocks away from each other could be different. For example, locals know the cheapest coffee shop in their community but visitors would not readily have access to this information.
https://www.economicsonline.co.uk/Business_economics/Monopolistic_competition.html

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monopolisticmarket.asp

What is a summary of Out of My Mind by Sharon M. Draper?

This book is about an eleven-year-old girl named Melody who has a condition called cerebral palsy. Because she cannot speak, walk, use the bathroom on her own, or feed herself, people assume that she is stupid, but she is actually quite bright and has a photographic memory. She has a pink wheelchair, but she thinks it does not make the wheelchair any cuter. Her reality—that people do not realize what a good mind she has—drives her crazy. Even doctors do not understand her. She is placed in a class for developmentally delayed kids and is incredibly bored, though she cannot relate that information to the people around her. She has a normal developing sister named Penny, who is 8 years younger than she is. 
When she is in fifth grade, she begins to use a communication device to speak, and she is placed in a standard class with the help of an aide. However, the students around her continue to think she is dumb, and some students bully her. She participates in a trivia contest and helps her team win a spot in a national competition. However, she continues to deal with exclusion and misunderstanding from the people around her.

How does Jem realize that Boo Radley was the one who placed a blanket on Scout's shoulders during the fire?

In chapter 8 of To Kill a Mockingbird, on the coldest night in Atticus's memory, Atticus wakes the children in the middle of the night because Miss Maudie's house is on fire. Scout and Jem are told to stand out of the way near the Radley place. The children stay where they've been told and watch as the neighbors work to save some of Miss Maudie's belongings from the burning house. Scout notices how the men have shed their robes due to the heat of the flames, but she is cold.
Once the fire is extinguished and they are back in their own house, Atticus notices something about Scout and states, "I thought I told you two to stay put." The children explain that they stayed in front of the Radley place as they were told. Atticus then asks, "Then whose blanket is that?" Scout then becomes aware of the blanket across her shoulders.
As Jem is remembering the events, he recalls that Mr. Radley was fighting the fire with the other men, which means he could not have been the one to cover Scout with the blanket. Since all of the other men were seen near the fire, Jem arrives at the conclusion that Boo Radley must have been the one to place the blanket around Scout. Scout is so consumed with watching the fire that she doesn't notice.

Monday, November 21, 2016

Beginning Algebra With Applications, Chapter 2, 2.3, Section 2.3, Problem 86

Translate the phrase "twenty minus the sum of four-ninths of a number and three" into a variable expression. Then simplify the expression.

$
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
& \text{The unknown number: } n && \text{Assign a variable to one of the number quantities}\\
\\
& \text{The sum of four-ninths of the number and thrice: } \frac{4}{9}n+3 && \text{Use the assigned variable to write an expression for any other unknown quantity.}\\
\\
&= 20 - \left( \frac{4}{9}n + 3 \right)&& \text{Use the assigned variable to write the variable expression.}\\
\\
&= 20 - \frac{4}{9}n - 3\\
\\
&= 17 - \frac{4}{9}n
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
$

How do secrets play a role in "The Minister's Black Veil"?

Secrets play a major role in "The Minister's Black Veil"; there are the secret sins of the members of the congregation, sins they fear that the Reverend Mr. Hooper may see from behind his veil, and there are the possible sins that the minister himself may be hiding that also disturb the men and women. 
When Mr. Hooper approaches the meetinghouse,

[T]here was a general bustle, a rustling of women's gowns and shuffling of the men's feet, greatly at variance with that hushed repose which should attend the entrance of the minister.

Indeed, it is the fears of what Mr. Hooper may be looking at from behind his veil or what he may be hiding that disturbs the congregation when the minister passes, then mounts the pulpit, and afterwards as he continues to wear the veil. For, in demonstrating this sign of his own shame and melancholy to the world, Mr. Hooper indirectly forces his congregation to look inward and feel their own sins, secret sins they wish to hide. 
As time passes and Mr. Hooper refuses to take off the veil, the Puritans fear he hides some dark secret. Consequently, they shy away from the minister. One of the men remarks,

"The black veil, though it covers only our pastor's face, throws its influence over his whole person and makes him ghost-like from head to foot. Do you not feel it so?"

The members of Mr. Hooper's congregation are worried that he can see their sins, and because they think he does, the veil becomes "the symbol of a fearful secret between him and them." In reality, the veil disturbs Mr. Hooper, as well. 

He never willingly passed before a mirror or stooped to drink at a still fountain lest. . . he should be affrighted by himself.

When Elizabeth, his betrothed, asks him to remove the veil under threat of breaking their engagement, Mr. Hooper refuses, and even as he lies dying, the minister is adamant that he will not remove his veil. He tells those who ask him to take it from his face that when the friend does not hide the truth from his friend, when people do not shrink away from their Creator, "loathsomely treasuring up the secret of [their] sins," then he will be "the monster," and only then because until such time there is a veil covering all their faces, all their secret sins.

How can Buck's change from a civilized dog to a complete product of the wilderness be described?

Buck, whose father was a St. Bernard and his mother a Scotch shepherd dog, begins his life as a pampered pet, living in the Santa Clara Valley of California on Judge Miller's place. In the fall of 1897 when the Klondike strike brings men from everywhere in search of gold, this influx of prospectors creates a great demand for sled dogs. So, when one of the workers named Manuel finds himself in debt from gambling, he decides to secretly sell Buck to a couple of men as a way of paying his debt. One of these men wears a red sweater, and he beats Buck severely in an attempt to "break" him. 
After he is sold to two French Canadians—"a new kind of man" to Buck—he quickly learns that they are not mean. When he is put with other dogs, Buck is amazed at their behavior. Thirty or forty huskies have surrounded a dog named Curly, and they strike then leap away. By the time the men come with clubs, Curly is dead. Another shock is dealt Buck when he finds himself harnessed, and set to work, hauling firewood. François and Perrault later set out on the trail with the mail that they are to deliver. Buck begins to adapt to the wilderness and snow, even learning how to cover himself with it at night. Because he is large, Buck becomes the rival of Spitz, who is the lead dog of the team. Eventually, they fight and Buck kills Spitz in a brutal fight.

Mercy was a thing reserved for gentler climes. . . . Buck stood . . . the successful champion, the dominant primordial best who had made his kill and found it good.

Buck begins to enjoy his new life as the lead dog, and with him at the front of the pack, the carriers make record time. Unfortunately, François and Perrault later sell the team to another mail carrier, who overloads the sled and overworks the dogs. By the time the dogs reach their destination, they are physically spent and one dies. The carrier sells the dogs to three Americans, who know very little about dogsledding. They have not brought enough provisions, the woman insists upon riding in the sled, and they have too much baggage. By the time the trio stagger into John Thorton's camp, only five out of fifteen dogs are still alive. Thorton tries to warn the two men and woman that the ice over which they have been traveling is dangerous because it is melting. But, one of the men named Hal refuses to believe him. When the dogs begin to walk on, Buck refuses to move. Hal beats him without mercy. Thorton rushes Hal, knocking a knife from his hand. He cuts Buck's straps and saves him. Hal curses and moves forward with the sled, but he and the others only travel about a fourth of a mile when the ice breaks and humans and dogs are drowned in the icy water.
As Thorton's dog, Buck is privileged again. He proves his mettle by saving Thorton from drowning one day. Buck also attacks a belligerent man who seeks a fight with Thorton in a bar. One day Buck manages to pull a sled holding a thousand-pound load, and Thorton wins his bet of $1,600. With his winnings, Thorton, along with two other men, sets out for a hidden fortune of gold. For Buck it is "boundless delight, this hunting, fishing, and indefinite wandering through strange places." Because he has time to lie by the fire, Buck dreams of the "other world" that his instincts remember. In this dream, there is a hairy man who sleeps restlessly. Sometimes he peers with fear into the darkness of the night. Then, too, Buck hears "the call of the wild" in the forest primeval. Impulses begin to seize Buck and he ventures forth into the thicket, filled with "wild yearnings and stirrings" that he does not yet understand. One night he sees a wolf. After a while, Buck makes friends with this wolf, but he heads back to camp at night. Returning to his primordial state, Buck hunts and kills a bear and a moose after he begins to sleep away from the camp for days. When he finally kills the moose which he has tracked for days, Buck returns to camp, but as he is a couple of miles out, he smells something that makes the fur on his neck stand. When he nears the camp, Buck finds dogs with arrows in them. Then, he sees the Yeehat Indians dancing around the wreckage of the lodge. "Passion usurped cunning and reason" as Buck leaps upon them, ripping and tearing flesh. The Yeehats try to fight him off, but suddenly they decide to flee as they believe he is "the Evil Spirit." Buck finds his friend Thorton dead.
"From far away drifted a faint, sharp yelp, followed by a chorus of similar sharp yelps." It was the call, and without John Thorton to whom he could return, Buck realizes that "the claims of man no longer bound him." The pack runs at Buck, but he manages to kill several and fight off the others. Then, the wolf that Buck knows comes forward and they touch noses. Finally, an old wolf approaches and they sniff noses until the old wolf sits and howls at the moon. Now accepted, Buck joins the wolf pack; eventually, he becomes their leader. In fact, he is the topic of Indian legends, a Ghost Dog, who "has cunning better than they" as he steals from their camps and kills their dogs. Buck "defies their bravest hunters."

Who are the main characters in A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens?

In Charles Dickens's A Tale of Two Cities, the main characters are the following:
Sydney Carton
Madame Defarge                       
Jarvis Lorry
Alexandre Manette
Charles Darnay
Lucie Manette
1. Sydney Carton is the hero of the narrative and the most developed of all the characters. Introduced as a dissipated, unmotivated man who allows his talents to be exploited by C.J. Stryver, Sydney has no purpose to his life. After he meets his look-alike, Charles Darnay, and sees the love in Lucie Manette's eyes for Charles, Carton realizes he squanders his life. Further, because of his love for Lucie, Carton is motivated to accomplish something positive. After declaring his devotion to Lucie, he informs her he will make any sacrifice for her:

For you, and for any dear to you, I would do anything. . . I would embrace any sacrifice for you and for those dear to you. Try to hold me in your mind, at some quiet times, as ardent and sincere in this one thing (Bk. the Second, Chapter 13).

Carton becomes the novel's hero, as he trades places with Darnay in the prison in France during the Revolution and goes to the guillotine in his place.
2. Madame Thérèse Defarge is one of the greatest villains in literature. She is a flat character who has a single focus: an insatiable hunger for revenge against those involved in the abuse and deaths of her family. Even when her husband asks her to allow Dr. Manette to be removed from her death list since he has already suffered so much, she adamantly refuses. Remorseless and filled with hate, she embodies the chaos and blood-lust of the French Revolution.
3. Mr. Jarvis Lorry is a foil character for Dr. Alexandre Manette. The elderly Mr. Lorry is the sanguine voice of reason and stability. He is a moral and honest man, trustworthy and extremely loyal to Manette and his daughter Lucie.
4. Dr. Alexandre Manette is known as prisoner One Hundred and Five North Tower. Dr. Manette is the man who is "recalled to life." He was a well-to-do physician until he is forcibly taken into a carriage by the Evrémonde twins, who are later responsible for the deaths of Madame Defarge's family members. After Dr. Manette treats a wounded boy and a delirious young woman (the brother and sister of Thérèse) whose husband they killed through long-forced labor, he sends a letter to the authorities. The Evrémondes intercept this letter, however, and burn it. They then have Manette sent in secret to the Bastille, an old prison.
After the revolutionaries storm the Bastille, Monsieur Defarge finds the letter and his wife. Madame Defarge knits his name into her death list and has Manette condemned along with Charles (Evrémonde) Darnay.
5. Charles Darnay is really Charles Evrémonde, the son of one of the twins who cruelly abused and killed Madame Defarge's family. He goes to England to escape retribution for the sins of his father and uncle. He rejects the exploitation of the feudal system and believes in the ideal of liberty, but not the revolutionary practices in his country.When summoned by Gabielle, who is in grave danger, the loyal Charles returns to France. Unfortunately, his return puts him in danger.

The universal watchfulness so encompassed him, that if he had been taken in a net, or were being forwarded to his destination in a cage, he could not have felt his freedom more completely gone. (Bk.3, Chapter 1)

6. Lucie Manette is the typical Victorian heroine. She faints and swoons; she is naive and sweet and the object of male devotion. She is the "golden thread" that helps Dr. Manette be "recalled to life," and the "golden thread" for Sydney Carton, who is resurrected from a wasted life. He obtains spiritual rewards for his unselfish act of taking the place of Charles Darnay. Unfortunately, both Lucie and Charles are rather flat characters, but they serve to advance the narrative because they both represent a certain faith in humanity.

Read "The Man Who Turned Into a Stick" by Abe Kobo. How does this story function as social commentary or satire?

This story functions as a satire because it makes the argument that most people -- "98.4 percent of all those who die in a given month," in fact -- live such uneventful lives, are so "satisfied" with their lives, that they do nothing special at all, nothing that would warrant either reward or punishment.  A satire is a text that uses humor, irony, and wit to expose human weakness or folly in order to, hopefully, spur some kind of change in the person or people it targets.  The human weakness exposed by this text is that we have, evidently, become too complacent.  As the Man from Hell tells the Hippie Boy, "I'm sure you haven't any particular aim in mind" in regard to the stick, to which the Boy responds, "I'm not interested in aims," and the Hippie Girl confirms, "Aims are out-of-date."  It's as though they (and we) have no goals, at least not any extraordinary ones: that the vast majority of people, in reality, lack goals.
Therefore, when the Man from Hell tells the Hippie Boy and Girl when they sell him the stick for five dollars, "you may imagine you've struck a clever bargain, but one of these days you'll find out.  It wasn't just a stick you sold, but yourself," what he means is that this Boy and Girl will probably become sticks as well; after all, they've already confessed that they have no aims in life.  Just as the man who died was simply "a living stick [that] has turned into a dead stick," so too will they (that or "rubber hoses").  This is why the Boy and the stick "understand each other" in his words and "look alike" in the Girl's.  They are the same in that neither one lives or has lived a life that can be called exceptional or even interesting.  
The stick, as the Woman from Hell points out, is "encrusted with dirt" from being handled so much, that its bottom is "rubbed and scraped": evidence that it has been used, "employed by people for some particular purpose."  She believes that "it [has] suffered rather harsh treatment" as it "has scars all over it."  In other words, this stick, when it was alive, was only a "tool" as the Man from Hell calls it.  Perhaps it was used by others but really had no initiative of its own, no particular and personal "aims."  
This social commentary is rather bleak, however, because it does not seem as though we have much opportunity to change our fate.  The Woman from Hell wants to give the stick to the little boy (whose father changed into the stick), saying, "At least it ought to serve as a kind of mirror.  He can examine himself and make sure he won't become a stick like his father."  The Man from Hell laughs because no one who's truly "satisfied with himself" can avoid becoming a stick.  Ultimately, then, it seems that the only way to avoid turning into a stick when we die is to not be a stick while we're alive: we cannot be too satisfied or complacent.  We must push ourselves, have "aims," and really work for them.  Sadly, according to this story, it seems that most of us will fail to do so.

Why do you think the play Metamora by John Augustus Stone won the playwriting contest, and what was the judge looking for?

Aside from the fact that Metamora; or, The Last of the Wampanoags, by John Augustus Stone, fulfilled the stated requirements of the playwriting contest—that the play be a "tragedy, in five acts, of which the hero, or principal character, shall be an aboriginal of this country"—it also fulfilled the unstated requirements of the sponsor of the contest, American actor Edwin Forrest.
Forrest began his acting career in 1820, when he was fourteen years old, at a time when the American stage was dominated by English actors. The United States itself was little more than forty years old and was still trying to find its cultural identity, independent of the still-considerable influence of Great Britain.
In 1826, Forrest had his first real success when he played Othello at the Bowery Theatre in New York City. By 1828, when the contest was announced, Forrest's reputation as an actor had grown considerably, but Forrest was still looking for a "star" acting vehicle which would give him the kind of success that other actors enjoyed, particularly English actors.
The contest was a masterstroke of self-promotion. Forrest tapped into the growing literary Romanticism movement in the United States. He tapped into "the Indian problem" in the United States and into the theatre-going public's interest in "Indian plays." He also tapped into growing American nationalism.
Forrest enlisted William Cullen Bryant, a renowned poet and soon-to-be editor of the New York Evening Post, to head the award committee and to add prestige, respectability, and free publicity in the Post to the contest.
The 1828 contest that was won by Stone's play, Metamora, was the first of several such contests that Forrest sponsored, and it proved to be one of the most successful. Metamora was an instant theatrical success when it was produced in 1829 and provided Forrest with a "star" acting vehicle to which he returned to time and again for the next forty years of his career. Future contests produced The Gladiator by Robert Montgomery Bird and Jack Cade by Robert T. Conrad, which also became mainstays of Forrest's acting repertoire.


Metamora; or, The Last of the Wampanoags is a play that was written by John Augustus Stone (an American playwright and actor) in 1829 in response to a contest funded by actor Edwin Forrest. 
Forrest outlined his criteria for the competition in The New York Critic, writing that he would award  500 dollars to "the best tragedy, in five acts, of which the hero, or principal character, shall be an aboriginal of this country." The Committee of Award, which was led by William Cullen Bryant, selected Metamora out of the fourteen plays submitted to the contest. 
Metamora was, thus, likely chosen because it perfectly fit Forrest's aforementioned criteria; the play in five acts follows the conflict between the titular Metamora (a Wampanoag hero) and the Puritans who tried to settle New England in the 1600s. The play ends in tragedy, with Metamora stabbing his beloved wife, Nehmeokee, to death in order to prevent the "palefaces" from slaying her. Metamora is immediately thereafter killed by the arriving soldiers, and he dies cursing the white men and calling out the name of his wife.
This "romantic" ending was also probably attractive to the contest's judge, since its dramatic nature was in in line with the particular talents of Forrest, who got his start playing Othello (another non-white "outsider" character who causes the death of both himself and his wife) in New York. Without a doubt, choosing Metamora as the winner was smart: both the play and Forrest were greeted with immense success, bringing in record profits and sparking a trend of sentimental "Indian" dramas in the theatre world.
(A note on the source used to answer this question: all of this information is readily available in the introductory comments that preface the play!)

Sunday, November 20, 2016

Calculus: Early Transcendentals, Chapter 3, 3.3, Section 3.3, Problem 14

y = (1 - sec(x))/tan(x)
=(1 /tan(x))- (sec(x)/tan(x))
y= cot(x) - csc(x)
so now the y' is as follows
y' = d/(dx) (cot(x) - csc(x))
= d/(dx) (cot(x)) - d/(dx)(csc(x))

as
d/(dx) (cot(x))
=d/(dx) (cos(x)/sin(x))
= ( ((cosx *(d/(dx) sin x)) -((d/(dx) cos x * sinx)))/(sin^2 x)
= (-cos^2 x -sin^2 x)/(sin^2 x)
= - 1/(sin^2 x)
= -csc^2(x)
and
d/(dx) (csc(x))
=d/(dx) (1/sin(x))
= ((d/(dx) sin x)*1 - sinx * d/dx(1))/(sin^2(x))
= -cosx/sin^2(x)
=-csc x cot(x)
so,
y' =d/(dx) (cot(x)) -d/(dx)(csc(x))
=-csc^2(x)-csc x cot(x)

Could you please help me improve and correct my assignment for tomorrow?https://1drv.ms/w/s!AurSAarV_ZY9gR8PZ6OVjcmEQiHL Thanks!

The first suggestion I have for you is to carefully proofread and check the formatting on your answer. Having these issues corrected will go a long way toward making your assignment look like it has been worked on carefully. I think you chose some good points to illuminate the quotes from the play. The themes mentioned later in the assignment could easily be discussed within your answers. For example, the "fear/hysteria" theme is clearly connected to Abigail's outburst and "confession," in which she accuses three women of consorting with the devil. Abigail's persuasive playacting instills fear in those who believe that witchcraft is really in Salam and ramps up the hysteria among the other girls who are caught up in the game and the false accusations. The "reputation/pride" theme is certainly relevant to John Proctor, who seems to realize his own pride and fear of rush reputation have caused him to focus on himself rather than on the greater good. He learns too late that he should have fought harder to uphold truth amid the court proceedings, and his own lies about Abigail sully his integrity, making it necessary for him to give up everything in order to save his wife's life.

What are Georg and Ulrich doing out in the woods on a mountain in the middle of winter in "The Interlopers"?

Ulrich, the aristocratic legal owner of a piece of land that has been disputed for three generations, is out in the contested strip of forest hunting a "human enemy," Georg. Georg, who asserts that the land should rightfully belong to his family, is out hunting game. To Georg, the hunting is legitimate: he is defiantly asserting his right to gather resources on what should be his own land. Ulrich, on the other hand, considers the hunting poaching on his property and has gone out in the hopes of finding Georg alone in the woods. We learn that the generalized feud between the families has become personal in the case of these two, who hate each other bitterly. Ulrich and Georg do meet, caught up in hate, only to find out after being trapped under a tree and reconciling that they have a common enemy, also asserting a right to hunt in these woods.


Two deadly enemies, Georg Znaeym and Ulrich von Gradwitz, are out in the woodland for two different reasons: Znaeym continues to poach on the disputed land, and von Gradwitz hunts Znaeym and the other "prowling thieves" in the hope of discovering the trespassers.
Knowing that the roe deer are exposed as they run from the approaching storm, von Gradwitz, the inheritor of a quarrel over "a narrow strip of precipitous woodland" harbors a deep hatred for "the tireless game snatcher and raider" on this long-disputed territory. Therefore, he gathers his foresters and they set out to patrol this jealously held strip of woods. So zealously does von Gradwitz guard this land that he disregards the threats of the weather, and in his efforts to catch his enemy on his land, he does not heed the high winds.

If only on this wild night, in this dark, lone spot, he might come across Georg Znaeym, man to man, with none to witness—that was the wish that was uppermost in his thoughts.

Giving no heed to anything but his intense hatred for his foe, Ulrich steps around the trunk of a huge tree and suddenly comes vis-à-vis with his enemy. At that instant, both the foes have their fates altered forever.

Why is the fact that the Americans are helping the Russians important?

In the late author Tom Clancy’s first novel, The Hunt for Red October, the assistance rendered to the Russians by the United States is impor...